<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-acc-sgb] whois and spam harvesting-RESENDING
- To: <gnso-acc-sgb@xxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-whois-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-acc-sgb] whois and spam harvesting-RESENDING
- From: "Margie Milam" <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 13:06:56 -0600
I believe it is relevant in response to others citing abuse as the
reason for significantly restricting access to WHOIS.
Margie
-----Original Message-----
From: Margie Milam
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 1:02 PM
To: 'Milton Mueller'; robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
met@xxxxxxx
Cc: gnso-acc-sgb@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-whois-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-acc-sgb] whois and spam harvesting
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-acc-sgb@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-acc-sgb@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Milton Mueller
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 12:19 PM
To: robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; met@xxxxxxx
Cc: gnso-acc-sgb@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-whois-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-acc-sgb] whois and spam harvesting
This topic does not seem relevant to developing a restricted access
proposal.
Dr. Milton Mueller
Syracuse University School of Information Studies
http://www.digital-convergence.org
http://www.internetgovernance.org
>>> "Metalitz, Steven" <met@xxxxxxx> 05/14/07 4:05 PM >>>
>Of course, the FTC's own study showed the opposite of what EPIC stated
>-- that Whois is not a significant contributor of e-mail addresses for
>spamming purposes.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|