Re: [gnso-acc-sgb] Impact on UDRP

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dr. Dierker and all sgb members,

 Dr. Dierker and all sgb members,

  Another good UDRP reference is:
http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview/index.html

 The last good eMail address I had on Judith Oppenhiemer
is, j.oppenheimer@xxxxxxx

Hugh Dierker wrote:

>    I was afraid you would say that and I had other reasons for
> reviewing the UDRP so I spent some time searching for process for
> amenments. And by golly there just ain't one I can spot.
>   http://www.icann.org/udrp/udrp.htm  This is a really well preserved
> archive and easy to access even for a technically challenged
> individual as myself.
>
>   My conclusion is that it will take staff review and recommendations
> and then BoD resolution. I find no standing UDRP tf/wg or
> administrator.
>
>   The BoD members (and you know who are) will have to chime in on this
> one and I imagine even for a short personal opinion they will need
> staff review.
>
>   Perhaps Judith Oppenhiemer could let us know what she thinks if
> anyone has her current email.
>
>   Eric
>
> Doug Isenberg <disenberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>         v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}  o\:*
> {behavior:url(#default#VML);}  w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
> .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
> st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) }                I don?t believe
> the UDRP has been amended since it was approved by ICANN in 1999 ? so,
> the process for amending it is not clear (at least not to me ? though
> I?d be happy to hear from others on this point).  But, it does seem
> clear that either (1) the UDRP would need to be amended to accommodate
> some of the Whois proposals being discussed or (2) the Whois proposals
> being discussed need to be modified to accommodate the UDRP as it has
> existed since 1999.
>
>   Doug Isenberg
>   www.GigaLawFirm.com
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
>
>   From: Hugh Dierker [mailto:hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 3:13 PM
> To: Doug Isenberg; gnso-acc-sgb@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-acc-sgb] Impact on UDRP
>
>
>     Doug,
>
>
>
>     What is the standard (if there is one) process for amending the
> UDRP. Your logic is inescapable. And the OPoC is going to happen
> therefor we must make the changes necessary elsewhere.
>
>
>
>     I would be happy to do some "legwork" alone, if this is outside
> the "scope" of this WG. I think I could convince a few of my GA
> friends to help out.
>
>
>
>     Eric
>
>

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827