<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-arr-dt] Revised Draft ARR Letter
- To: gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: [gnso-arr-dt] Revised Draft ARR Letter
- From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:19:19 -0700
Looks good.
Tim
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [gnso-arr-dt] Revised Draft ARR Letter
From: William Drake <william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, January 18, 2010 4:17 pm
To: Caroline Greer <cgreer@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Hi
On Jan 18, 2010, at 8:53 PM, Caroline Greer wrote:
> Many thanks to Bill for the considerable polishing and editing work.
>
>
Sure, and thanks in turn for your input on the text. Ok, since Chuck
suggested we finish by COB today in order to get it out, attached is a
revised version that takes on board the comments made here and includes
the Chatham footnote.
Best,
Bill
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|