[gnso-arr-dt] RE: Revised Draft ARR Letter

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Nice job Bill.  Two minor, nonmaterial edits: 

1.      
        In the 1st sentence of the second paragraph, change
"literatures" to "literature".
2.      
        The first sentence of the fifth paragraph says, "Fourth,
selecting just one member from each relevant of the AC/SOs (or less, in
the case of Security, Stability and Resiliency team) seems especially
problematic."  I think it should say, "Fourth, selecting just one member
from each of the relevant AC/SOs (or less, in the case of Security,
Stability and Resiliency team) seems especially problematic."

I approve this draft and suggest that Bill send to it to the Council
list as soon as possible with a request that all Councilors forward it
to their respective groups immediately for review and discussion, noting
that the Council will have to finalize the comments on 28 January.
 
Thanks for the excellent effort by all on this.
 
Chuck


________________________________

        From: William Drake [mailto:william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Monday, January 18, 2010 5:17 PM
        To: Caroline Greer
        Cc: Gomes, Chuck; gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: Revised Draft ARR Letter
        
        
        Hi 

        On Jan 18, 2010, at 8:53 PM, Caroline Greer wrote:


                Many thanks to Bill for the considerable polishing and
editing work.


        Sure, and thanks in turn for your input on the text.  Ok, since
Chuck suggested we finish by COB today in order to get it out, attached
is a revised version that takes on board the comments made here and
includes the Chatham footnote.  

        Best,

        Bill