RE: [gnso-arr-dt] Summary of where we are

["Caroline Greer" <cgreer@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Chuck, this is very helpful. It's a tight timeline but, I think,
achievable.
 
Just one comment on the qualifications - several people have suggested
that those with existing, significant ICANN leadership positions (eg
GNSO, NomCom) ought not to be considered as a candidate. We should
discuss today how our group feels about this proposal and if there is
consensus, we should draw that out a little more in the document, beyond
a general statement around 'availability and willingness to commit the
time'. I think it's a very sensible limitation.
 
Caroline.
 
From: owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: 07 February 2010 15:07
To: gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-arr-dt] Summary of where we are
Importance: High
 
The attached MS Word document contains the following:
1.      AoC DT Action Plan for Development of GNSO Endorsement of RT
Volunteers 
2.      Proposed One-Time Process for GNSO Endorsement of AoC
Accountability & Transparency Review Team Volunteers
3.      Proposed Qualifications
Items 1 & 2 are for the most part the same as what I previously sent to
the list as a suggested plan forward with a few updates, some additions
and comments and restructuring to make it easier to reference and
discuss.  In item 3 I listed the ICANN AoC qualifications and added the
four GNSO qualifications I suggested along with Kristina's suggestions
for data needed.
 
My hope is that this will facilitate our discussion on the list and in
the pending teleconference call.
 
It might be helpful if everyone could respond on the list to the
following:
*       Regarding item 1, does everyone agree with the action plan?  If
not, please suggest changes.
*       Regarding item 2, there has been quite a lot of discussion on
geographic representation, so I encourage specific suggestions for
change.
*       Regarding item 3, is their concensus on the item j information
to be requested from candidates?  If not, please suggest edits.  We will
need to discuss the other qualifications a lot more.
Hope this is helpful.  All of it can be changed, but we need to do so
very quickly because we have to produce a final proposal by Wednesday,
10 Feb.
 
Chuck
________________________________