RE: [gnso-arr-dt] FW: [soac-discussion] FW: Next selection

["Caroline Greer" <cgreer@xxxxxxxxx>]

2 weeks for SG conferral / endorsement and GNSO action? Not likely....
 
4 weeks (30 days) at best I would say. That's going on the 21 days for
SG action proposal that I had yesterday. 
 
Is there no possibility of getting the call out before 25th June? Why
wait until then, particularly if Council has voted on this on the next
call. 
 
Caroline.
 
From: owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: 27 May 2010 17:20
To: gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-arr-dt] FW: [soac-discussion] FW: Next selection
 
To allow for both SG and possible Council action on the AoC RT
endorsement process, I suggested 45 days total for the GNSO endorsement
process after the close of the application period.  Here's the response
I received.  I personally don't see any way to reduce it to 2 weeks.
What do others think?
 
Chuck
 
From: Marco Lorenzoni [mailto:marco.lorenzoni@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 4:57 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Janis Karklins; soac-discussion@xxxxxxxxx; Rod
Beckstrom
Cc: Donna Austin; Alice Jansen; Olof Nordling
Subject: RE: [soac-discussion] FW: Next selection
 
Chuck, thanks for the good news of the GNSO getting close to finalize
this process.
45 days seems to me a too long period of time; let's work backward based
on this hypothesis.
October 1st - beginning activities RTs 2 and 4
September 20 - final list of candidates delivered to Selectors for
selection of members
August 1st - closing of the application period
June 25 (end Bxl meeting) - launching of call for applicants.
This means that the application period will run only for one month in
July, summer holiday in this part of the world... From my perspective
this can have negative repercussions in terms of outreach.
Would it be feasible to squeeze the 'internal' period down from 45 to 2
weeks?
Best regards
Marco
 
Marco Lorenzoni
---------------------
ICANN
Director, Organizational Review
marco.lorenzoni@xxxxxxxxx
Phone: +32.2.234 78 69
Mobile: +32.475.72 47 47
Fax: +32 2 234 7848
Skype: marco_lorenzoni
---------------------
6, Rond Point Schuman
B-1040 Brussels, Belgium
 
 
From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, 27 May, 2010 01:47
To: Janis Karklins; soac-discussion@xxxxxxxxx; Rod Beckstrom
Cc: Marco Lorenzoni; Donna Austin; Alice Jansen
Subject: RE: [soac-discussion] FW: Next selection
 
The GNSO is getting close to finalizing an ongoing process for endorsing
candidates and to help us to that I have one question for the Selectors
and staff supporting the process:  The GNSO SGs will need some time
after the end of the candidate application period ends to endorse
candidates and once they do that, the GNSO Council may also have to act.
Would 45 days be too much time after close of the application period? Is
it reasonable to think that that much time could be built into the
process or is that too much?
 
Chuck
 
 
From: owner-soac-discussion@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-soac-discussion@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Janis Karklins
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 1:11 AM
To: soac-discussion@xxxxxxxxx; 'Rod Beckstrom'
Cc: 'Marco Lorenzoni'; 'Donna Austin'; 'Alice Jansen'
Subject: [soac-discussion] FW: Next selection
 
Dear colleagues
 
Two Affirmation-mandated reviews are to start on October 1st, namely the
'Whois policy'; and 'Security, Stability and Resiliency of the DNS'.
The lesson we learned from the 'Accountability and Transparency'
experience is that the process leading to the establishment of a Review
Team can be quite time-consuming. Hence my suggestion would be to start
the preliminary activities for these upcoming reviews quite soon. 
 
Based on our experience I would like to suggest the following sequence:
*         Chairs consult their respective AC/SO on the size and
composition of the both RTs - next 3 weeks.
*         After agreement among Chairs on the issue above, the call for
nominations is renewed and each AC/SO would endorse 2-3 time more
candidates that agreed above - mid May - 20 June.
*         Selectors make selection and announce composition of the both
RTs at the end of the Brussels meeting.
 
Would this sequence be acceptable? Pls provide your comments at your
earliest convenience.
 
Best regards
JK
 
PS. The proposal has not been agreed yet by both Selectors. These are
just my personal ideas. JK