<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-arr-dt] RE: Draft Motion to Approve Endorsement Process
- To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-arr-dt] RE: Draft Motion to Approve Endorsement Process
- From: William Drake <william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 18:52:32 +0200
Hi Chuck
On May 29, 2010, at 4:48 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> Once we have the proposed process finalized, the motion may be made. The
> motion must be made on the Council list not later than Wednesday, 2 June.
Did I miss the answer on this, how many days to fix for SG endorsement? I
didn't think I'd seen a resolution in your threads with Janis, staff etc. Also
is the term of art we refer to the Call for Applications?
> On May 27, 2010, at 9:38 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>
>>
>> Note the following message I just sent to the SOAC list regarding opening
>> the call for AoC RT applicants. As soon as we have our draft process, I
>> would like to send it to Marco & Janis if no one objects. Can we finalize
>> the proposed process not later than tomorrow so that Bill may send it to the
>> Council list by then? If so, then I will send it as a draft to Marco &
>> Janis.
>
> Mixing together the details of the next two RTs and the permanent process
> seems to complicate discussion, how about we focus here on the latter. To
> finalize we need clarification from selectors et al on the expected regular
> RT time cycles so contracted folk can decide how long they can have after the
> calls close, bearing in mind the potentially three week wait after that to
> the next council call. When you reach closure we'll plug in the number.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|