ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-arr-dt] RE: Draft Motion to Approve Endorsement Process

  • To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-arr-dt] RE: Draft Motion to Approve Endorsement Process
  • From: William Drake <william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 18:52:32 +0200

Hi Chuck

On May 29, 2010, at 4:48 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:

> Once we have the proposed process finalized, the motion may be made.  The 
> motion must be made on the Council list not later than Wednesday, 2 June. 

Did I miss the answer on this, how many days to fix for SG endorsement?  I 
didn't think I'd seen a resolution in your threads with Janis, staff etc.  Also 
is the term of art we refer to the Call for Applications?

> On May 27, 2010, at 9:38 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>> Note the following message I just sent to the SOAC list regarding opening 
>> the call for AoC RT applicants.  As soon as we have our draft process, I 
>> would like to send it to Marco & Janis if no one objects. Can we finalize 
>> the proposed process not later than tomorrow so that Bill may send it to the 
>> Council list by then?  If so, then I will send it as a draft to Marco & 
>> Janis.
> Mixing together the details of the next two RTs and the permanent process 
> seems to complicate discussion, how about we focus here on the latter.  To 
> finalize we need clarification from selectors et al on the expected regular 
> RT time cycles so contracted folk can decide how long they can have after the 
> calls close, bearing in mind the potentially three week wait after that to 
> the next council call.  When you reach closure we'll plug in the number.

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy