ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-ccwg-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-ccwg-dt] RE: For your review: revised draft charter

  • To: Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-ccwg-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-ccwg-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-ccwg-dt] RE: For your review: revised draft charter
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 14:29:23 +0000

Thanks Becky, John and Mary for the quick turn-around on this.  Here is my
feedback.

 

Is there a reason why we refer to '(Co-)Chairs' throughout the charter.  Why
not call them 'Co-Chairs'?

 

Is it correct to assume that the Co-Chairs will be appointed from the
Members of the WG, in other words, they would be allowed to vote?  It might
be good to clarify this.  In my opinion, if the co-chairs represent their SO
or AC, then they should be allowed to vote by simply taking off their
co-chair hast when doing so; otherwise, the SO/AC would lose one of their
voices when voting occurs.  On the other hand, if the co-chairs are expected
to serve specifically in a completely neutral capacity, then they would not
need to vote; in such a case though, I don't think they should be included
in the Minimum and Maximum Member numbers.  I think it would be helpful to
clarify these issues in the charter.

 

Am I correct in assuming that Observers need to be appointed just like
Members? If so, the following statement is fine: "Each of the participating
SOs and ACs shall appoint Participants to the WG in accordance with their
own rules and procedures." If not (i.e., if Observers may participate
without being appointed by their SO/AC), then this probably should be
changed to "Each of the participating SOs and ACs shall appoint Members to
the WG in accordance with their own rules and procedures."

 

Regarding SOIs the charter says: "Participants from SOs or ACs for which a
Statement of Interest is required for participation in a WG shall submit an
SOI in accordance with the rules applicable to that SO/AC (if any)."  This
seems to imply that an SOI is not required if the applicable SO/AC doesn't
require one.  I think an SOI should be required by all WG Participants and I
assume that that is what is intended.  Here's some possible rewording to
make it clear:  "All Participants must submit a Statement of Interest for
participation in the WG.  Participants from SOs or ACs for which a Statement
of Interest is required for participation in a WG shall submit an SOI in
accordance with the rules applicable to that SO/AC (if any); others shall
submit an SOI that provides comparable information according to the rules of
one of the SO/ACs for which SOIs are required."

 

Chuck

 

From: owner-gnso-ccwg-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-ccwg-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Mary Wong
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 3:35 PM
To: gnso-ccwg-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-ccwg-dt] For your review: revised draft charter

 

Dear DT members,

 

Please find attached the draft charter, revised following the call yesterday
and as reviewed by the Co-Chairs, in both CLEAN and REDLINED versions. Once
we are able to confirm a date and time for the next DT meeting, I will send
you the information about that as well. As such, please take a moment to
fill out the Doodle poll at your earliest convenience:
http://doodle.com/4zur3s2auax8ivr8

 

Thanks and cheers

Mary

 

Mary Wong

Senior Policy Director

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)

Telephone: +1 603 574 4892

Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx

 

* One World. One Internet. *

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy