RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] Private WIKI for Consensus group

[<tony.ar.holmes@xxxxxx>]

Chuck

I'm not sure that'll be helpful in this case. Whilst we all need to take 
soundings from our constituent's this could result in full mail boxes as well 
as enabling people outside of the discussion to adopt strong lobbying opinions 
without understanding the full background. 

I see no reason why this exercise should be constrained by GNSO practices at 
this stage. It reports to the Board, not the GNSO.

Regards

Tony


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: 01 July 2008 16:37
To: Glen de Saint Géry; gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] Private WIKI for Consensus group


To be consentent with recent GNSO practices it probably would be a good idea to 
give public read-only access and group members read/write access.  But maybe we 
should let the group decide on that.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Glen de Saint 
> Géry
> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 6:15 AM
> To: gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-consensus-wg] Private WIKI for Consensus group
> 
> 
> Dear All,
> 
> Would you like a private WIKI, that is one that can only be read and 
> edited by members of the group, set up for the group's work?
> 
> Let me know.
> Thank you very much.
> 
> Glen
> 
> Glen de Saint Géry
> GNSO Secretariat
> gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://gnso.icann.org
> 
> 
> 
>