ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-consensus-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-consensus-wg] User/Non-Contracted Party vs Registrant

  • To: "gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-consensus-wg] User/Non-Contracted Party vs Registrant
  • From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:57:50 -0400

I have said this a number of times, and we have agreed to it in principle, but it never seems to make it into a draft.

The Board adopted a large part of the BGC report, and this (according to Roberto Gaetano) INCLUDED the definition of what we are now calling Users or Non-Contracted Parties. This definition is Registrant.

Now because most of us happen to own (lease?) domains, we are often technically registrants. But that is not how we see ourselves in most of our discussions.

The current By-Laws talk about Commercial and Non-Commercial USERS. The adopted BGC report changed that.

To make sure that the Board reverts to the current definition, it must be EXPLICITLY in our report. A simple statement such as "The definition of the Non-Contracted House should be that of USER and NON-CONTRACTED PARTY, and not the more restrictive "REGISTRANT".

Alan 


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy