RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] First Draft Consensus Group Report - Responses Please By 1900PDT-300UTC

["Milton L Mueller" <mueller@xxxxxxx>]

response to jon from mm

-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx on behalf of Nevett, Jonathon
>
>Just three initial points:
>
>1.     I don't think that anyone suggested deleting as moot 4.g
>(Removal of NomCom Appointees), but rather 4.d (Appointing a Task
>Force).
>
>2.     I don't want to speak for others, but I don't think that
>everyone signed off on the process/threshold/default on the election of
>GNSO Chair. 

We didn't sign off, preferred to have Nomcom directly appoint the chair, but 
also did not view this as a deal-killer if it is the only remaining obstacle. I 
am a bit confused by Jon's comment below as to which he considers the majority 
and which the minority position. 

> I think that enough of us agreed to it that it should be in
>the draft (and it sounds like that it is a condition for Avri to approve
>the package), but it should be noted that there was a minority viewpoint
>that had concerns, but that it wasn't a deal killer issue for them.

>3.     I would suggest deleting Principle C (Each House will determine
>its own total number of seats) as it is no longer relevant.  In the

I agree

--MM