Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] WHOIS-Related Current and Completed Work

[Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Julie,

Thanks for laying this all out for us. It’s quite helpful. Just in case I 
wasn’t clear during the call, my comment/question was related to two of the 
questions this PDP has been chartered to answer and listed on a separate page 
on the WG wiki:

Q6. When would policy come into effect?

I imagine that the timelines involved in the concurrent projects will influence 
the answer to this question, of course also depending on what this WG 
recommends on how desirable or undesirable it is to translate and/or 
transliterate contact info. The EWG on gTLD Directory Services is wrapping up 
its work with the public comment period on their report nearing conclusion. I 
guess this means we can expect an issue report on this soon.

Q7. What should be mandatory?

Although I personally think it would have been helpful for this PDP to address 
what data elements in registrants' contact info should be translated, this is 
not a really relevant observation right now. It is clearly outside of our 
scope, and in answering this question, we need to focus on wether it should be 
mandatory to translate/transliterate contact info associated with all gTLDs as 
well as for all registrants in all countries.

Perhaps, in light of all the projects potentially influencing this PDP and 
their timelines, we should start discussing the order in which we would like to 
answer our charter questions. That is assuming we’re settled on the actual 
questions. :)

Thanks.

Amr

On Feb 20, 2014, at 9:50 PM, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Dear PDP WG members,
> 
> In response to the question from Amr today about whether there is 
> WHOIS-related PDP (or other) work that may be addressing the same issues as 
> the PDP WG please see below the list of current and recently completed work.  
> Staff have presented some of this information at various times in the 
> formation of this PDP WG, and via presentations from Margie Milam and Steve 
> Sheng at a previous meeting, but it appears that it would be helpful to put 
> it all in one place to avoid any confusion.  One thing to note is that 
> following the Board resolutions on WHOIS in November 2012 a large number of 
> projects (both PDP and non-PDP) were launched and the Board envisioned that 
> these would proceed concurrently, rather than consecutively.  See the helpful 
> blog from Margie Milam on all of the WHOIS-related developments at: 
> http://blog.icann.org/2013/03/whois-whats-to-come/.  
> 
> As I noted on today's call, this PDP WG is the only PDP that addresses the 
> specific issues relating to the translation and transliteration of contact 
> information.  The work of this PDP WG will be taken into consideration in 
> conjunction with the Board-initiated PDP on gTLD directory services, which is 
> tied to the work of the Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services (see 
> below).  The final report of the EWG will form the Final Issue Report for 
> that Board-initiated PDP.  
> 
> The Expert Working Group that is defining requirements for internationalized 
> registration data and a corresponding data model for gTLD registries (#3 
> below) is the group that Jim Galvin is leading.  The work of that group is 
> tied closely to that of this PDP WG.  Both relate to item #13 in the chart in 
> Margie's blog, which is taken from the Board's work plan.  That plan states, 
> "ICANN will form a community working group to determine appropriate 
> internationalized domain name registration data requirements based on 
> requirements set forth in GNSO internationalized registration data working 
> Group final Report."  The work this PDP WG will be considered by this EWG so 
> the two groups will coordinate closely.
> 
> I have added this information to the studies and background page on the wiki 
> at: 
> https://community.icann.org/display/tatcipdp/7.+Studies+and+Background+Documents.
>   For a list of active GNSO PDP and non-PDP projects see: 
> http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/active. 
> 
> As you can see, these efforts are very much intertwined.  Policies resulting 
> from this PDP WG (if any) will be key elements in future policies relating to 
> the development of a new gTLD directory service, in defining requirements for 
> internationalized registration data, and in the development of the data model 
> for gTLD registries.
> 
> Please let me know if you have further questions.
> 
> Best regards,
> Julie
> 
> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
> 
> Recently Completed Work: 
> 
> PDP on Thick WHOIS: 
> http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/active/thick-whois 
> 
> The GNSO Council requested an Issue Report on 'thick' Whois at its meeting on 
> 22 September 2011 noting that the Issue Report should 'not only consider a 
> possible requirement of 'thick' WHOIS for all incumbent gTLDs in the context 
> of IRTP, but should also consider any other positive and/or negative effects 
> that are likely to occur outside of IRTP that would need to be taken into 
> account when deciding whether a requirement of 'thick' WHOIS for all 
> incumbent gTLDs would be desirable or not'.
> 
> The Final Report was adopted by the ICANN Board on 07 February 2014. See the 
> resolution at: 
> http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-07feb14-en.htm#2.c.
>  
> 
> Current Work:
> 
> 1. Study Group to Evaluate Available Solutions for the Submission and Display 
> of Internationalized Contact Data.
> See: 
> https://community.icann.org/display/whoisird/Study+to+Evaluate+Available+Solutions+for+the+Submission+and+Display+of+Internationalized+Contact+Data
> 
> The purpose of the study is to: 
> Document the submission and display practices of internationalized 
> registration data at a representative set of gTLD and ccTLD registries and 
> registrars.  
> Investigate and document how other e-merchants or web sites manage 
> internationalized contact data.
> Consider and assess the cost and functionality of commercial, open source, or 
> other known but as yet not widely implemented solutions for 1) 
> transliterating internationalized contact information to US-ASCII, 2) 
> translating internationalized contact information to English,  3) 
> transcribing internationalized contact information to US-ASCII, or 4) a 
> mixture of translation, transliteration and transcription.   
> Consider and assess the accuracy implications for transliteration and 
> translation of the internationalized contact data
> Based on practices documented in 1  and understanding the issues raised in 3 
> and 4  and best practices by other e-merchants in 2, summarize some common 
> best practices registry/registrar could do to minimize these variations, if 
> translation and/or transliteration is deemed necessary. 
>     The study team is currently on the first task, and has prepared a 
> registry and registrar survey to complete. Since this group is closely 
> working in this area, we appreciate very much if you have any feedback on 
> these survey questions. Such feedback will help us to make sure we ask the 
> right questions.  
> 
> 2.  Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services, See: 
> http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services
> 
> 13 December 2012 – Fadi Chehadé, ICANN's President and CEO, announces the 
> creation of an Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services. This first 
> step in fulfilling the ICANN Board's directive to help redefine the purpose 
> and provision of gTLD registration data will provide a foundation to help the 
> ICANN community (through the Generic Names Supporting Organization, GNSO) 
> create a new global policy for gTLD directory services. Interested 
> individuals are invited to indicate their interest in serving as volunteer 
> working group members.
> Initial Report: 
> http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report-24jun13-en.pdf
> Status Update Report: 
> http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/status-update-11nov13-en.pdf
>  
> See the Preliminary Issue Report of the Board-initiated PDP at: 
> http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/gtld-registration-data-15mar13-en.htm.
>  
> 
> 3.  Expert Working Group to Define Requirements for Internationalized 
> Registration Data and Corresponding Data Model for gTLD Registries
> See: http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-08jul13-en.htm. 
> 
> As part of the process to implement WHOIS review team recommendations related 
> to Internationalized Domain Name registration data requirements, ICANN seeks 
> volunteers who are community representatives with expertise in linguistics, 
> IDNA, policy and registry/registrar operations to participate in a working 
> group to determine appropriate Internationalized Domain Name registration 
> data requirements and data model for Registration Data Directory Services 
> (aka WHOIS services).  The result of the WG product will go through a public 
> comment process to ensure broad input is received. It will form the basis for 
> further policy development and/or contractual framework for generic Top-level 
> domains, as well as ideally becoming  a best practice for country code 
> top-level domains.
> 
> 
> 
>