RE: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] FW: Request for input

[Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Wolf-Ulrich,

 

Thank you for this, apology noted.

 

Kindest regards

 

Nathalie

 

From: owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of WUKnoben
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 10:59 AM
To: Lars Hoffmann; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] FW: Request for input

 

>From my GNSO council experience with the GAC I didn't expect a different
answer - I'm even more happy having received any GAC answer.

If there is a F2F WG meeting planned in Singapore I'd suggest to invite the
GAC members who have been asked to answer the questionnaire.

 

I'm really sorry that today I have to miss the call again. My apologies!
It's not because of the carnaval season in our region.

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich

 

From: Lars Hoffmann <mailto:lars.hoffmann@xxxxxxxxx>  

Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 3:09 PM

To: gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx 

Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] FW: Request for input

 

Dear Working Group members,

Please find below the response from Olof Nordling, ICANN Senior Director GAC
Relations, with regard to the WG's request to meet with the GAC in
Singapore. Spoiler alert: It's not good news. It might be useful at this
stage for the Chairs (or staff if you wish so) to re-send the input request
to the individual GAC members that were contacted and have not yet replied
as this might be at this stage the most promising way to gather at least
some input from some of the GAC members. 

Best wishes,

Lars

 

 

 

 

From: Olof Nordling <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, February 24, 2014 2:59 PM
To: Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "gacsec@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <gacsec@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Julie Hedlund
<julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Request for input

 

Dear Lars,

Thank you for your kind request from the WG on Translation and
Transliteration of Contact Information for input from the GAC and for a
meeting in Singapore.

This has been brought to the GAC Chair's attention. On her behalf I must
inform you that, in view of the time available and the current number of
priority matters to address by the GAC where a joint position is essential,
any joint response by the GAC to the questions raised cannot realistically
be foreseen. Nor does the time allow for a separate meeting with the WG in
Singapore.

Very best regards

Olof

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature