Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Straw poll on number of options

["Dillon, Chris" <c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Petter,

Thank you for voting. Your vote is noted.

Regards,

Chris.
--
Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, 
Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) 
www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon

From: Petter Rindforth 
<petter.rindforth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:petter.rindforth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Reply-To: Petter Rindforth 
<petter.rindforth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:petter.rindforth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Wednesday, 26 November 2014 21:17
To: Chris Dillon <c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx>>
Cc: 
"gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>" 
<gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Straw poll on number of options

Dear All,

As I presume that I cannot convince all of you to vote in favour of mandatory 
translation/transliteration, my vote is:

No

All the best,
Petter

--
Petter Rindforth, LL M

Fenix Legal KB
Stureplan 4c, 4tr
114 35 Stockholm
Sweden
Fax: +46(0)8-4631010
Direct phone: +46(0)702-369360
E-mail: petter.rindforth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:petter.rindforth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
www.fenixlegal.eu


NOTICE
This e-mail message is intended solely for the individual or individuals to 
whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential attorney-client privileged 
information and attorney work product. If the reader of this message is not the 
intended recipient, you are requested not to read, copy or distribute it or any 
of the information it contains. Please delete it immediately and notify us by 
return e-mail.
Fenix Legal KB, Sweden, www.fenixlegal.eu
Thank you


25 november 2014, Dillon, Chris <c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx>> 
skrev:

Dear colleagues,



During Thursday's call, we had a straw poll:

Are you in favor of having only one option in the initial report?

As you know, in the versions of the draft initial report until now there have 
been two options (recommendations for and against mandatory transformation), 
but if it is possible to have only one, the report will likely have a stronger 
effect. Whatever the result of the report, the arguments for and against will 
remain in it; this poll only concerns the options.

Please send your vote to the list if you did not vote on Thursday. The options 
are: Yes, No and Abstain.

Please vote by 14:00 UTC on Thursday 27 November. (Note that there is no 
meeting on that day; the next one is 4 December.)



In summary

- This is not a consensus call on the options.

- This is to decide whether the initial report should have one set of 
recommendations or two sets of recommendations.

- If a majority believes it should be only one set, the WG, at a later stage 
(probably during our next meeting, on 4 December) will decide which set it will 
be.

- Please bear in mind that this is the initial report and following public 
comments on it we will be able to modify/amend/change/reverse our draft 
recommendations.



Incidentally, I shall email soon asking for your comments on version 5 of the 
report and including the rest of mine.



Regards,



Chris.

--

Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, 
Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) 
www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon<http://www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon>