RE: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Straw poll on number of options

["Dillon, Chris" <c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Peter,

Thank you for your vote.

I believe we do agree that we need to get the initial report out according to 
the work plan, although we are running about a week behind it. In which case, I 
take your vote as a “no”.

I will pick up the issues you raise during our next meetings.

Regards,

Chris.
--
Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, 
Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) 
www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon<http://www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon>

From: Peter Dernbach [mailto:pdernbach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 26 November 2014 22:30
To: Dillon, Chris
Cc: gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Straw poll on number of options

Dear Chris and All,
Apologies that I have not been able to attend the most recent conference calls 
due to other pressing work commitments. I am new to ICANN Working Groups, so am 
not as familiar with the process as many of you are. My procedural question is 
this: how important is the date for delivering our Initial Report?  It seems 
clear to me that our working group has not yet reached a consensus position. I 
also believe that issuing an initial report with multiple opinions may not be 
as helpful to the community in the policy making process. Is there another 
option of providing an update saying that the Working Group has not yet come to 
a consensus on the content of its initial report, so the initial report will be 
delayed while we continue to work on reaching consensus?

The question at hand is "am I in favor of having only one opinion in the 
initial report?" In theory, I am, but if we need to issue an initial report at 
this stage, I do not think we should include only one opinion as I do not think 
that reflects the current state of the Working Group.

Best regards,
Peter


[http://www.winklerpartners.com/Winkler-logo.gif]<http://www.winklerpartners.com/>

Peter J.Dernbach
譚璧德




Partner
合夥律師(外國法事務律師)



T 886 (0)2 2311 2345 # 222
F 886 (0)2 2311 2688



www.winklerpartners.com<http://www.winklerpartners.com>
pdernbach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:pdernbach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

________________________________


NOTICE: This email and any attachments contain private, confidential and 
privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient.
If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, copy or distribute the 
contents and are requested to delete them and to notify the sender.

本電子郵件及其附件含有私有、機密、依法受特別保護之資料，僅供意定之收件人使用。若您並非所意定之收件人，即不得予以使用、重製或散布，並請刪除其內容，並通知寄件人。


On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Dillon, Chris 
<c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Dear colleagues,

During Thursday's call, we had a straw poll:
Are you in favor of having only one option in the initial report?
As you know, in the versions of the draft initial report until now there have 
been two options (recommendations for and against mandatory transformation), 
but if it is possible to have only one, the report will likely have a stronger 
effect. Whatever the result of the report, the arguments for and against will 
remain in it; this poll only concerns the options.
Please send your vote to the list if you did not vote on Thursday. The options 
are: Yes, No and Abstain.
Please vote by 14:00 UTC on Thursday 27 November. (Note that there is no 
meeting on that day; the next one is 4 December.)

In summary
- This is not a consensus call on the options.
- This is to decide whether the initial report should have one set of 
recommendations or two sets of recommendations.
- If a majority believes it should be only one set, the WG, at a later stage 
(probably during our next meeting, on 4 December) will decide which set it will 
be.
- Please bear in mind that this is the initial report and following public 
comments on it we will be able to modify/amend/change/reverse our draft 
recommendations.

Incidentally, I shall email soon asking for your comments on version 5 of the 
report and including the rest of mine.

Regards,

Chris.
--
Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, 
Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599<tel:%2B44%2020%207679%201599> 
(int 31599) 
www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon<http://www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon>