<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Timeline and notes
- To: James Galvin <jgalvin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Timeline and notes
- From: "Dillon, Chris" <c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 14:59:20 +0000
Dear Jim,
Many thanks for sending your comments.
To start to answer your earlier email, there is two-thirds agreement for one
option, so there will be one. However, we have not had a poll on which option.
There is a discussion going on off-list as to how best to run the poll and its
possible effect on the timeline.
Regards,
Chris.
--
Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL,
Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599)
www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon<http://www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon>
From: James Galvin [mailto:jgalvin@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 05 December 2014 13:50
To: Dillon, Chris; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Timeline and notes
It seems I provided all of my comments during the meeting yesterday.
Nonetheless, here is the document with my comments.
Thanks,
Jim
From: James Galvin [mailto:jgalvin@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 04 December 2014 22:22
To: Dillon, Chris;
gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Timeline and notes
I'm sorry I had to drop off early but I do have a question.
It was looking to me like there was consensus for one recommendation, even
though we will provide both sides of the argument. Is that still where we are?
If so, which recommendation of the alternatives was chosen? If so, will be
publishing one recommendation in the initial report?
I will submit my comments on 6a, some of which you already got because I was
able to provide them during the call.
Thanks,
Jim
On 12/4/14, 1:35 PM, Dillon, Chris wrote:
Dear colleagues,
As we get closer to the public comment period, I would like to clarify the
timeline I mentioned towards the end of today's meeting and add a few notes
about the editing.
Deadlines
* Submitting final substantive comments by: Friday, 5 December CoB
* Distribution of clean V7: Monday 8 December CoB
* Sign off on Initial Report: Thursday 11 December WG call
* Opening of Public Comment: Friday 12 December
* Closing of Public Comment (6 weeks + 1 week to make up for holidays: 30
January 2015)
Notes
* Nothing in the Initial Report is binding to us or prevents future
changes/u-turns;
* We will not remove arguments for/against mandatory transformation from
this or the final report;
* Public comments received will give us an idea of the community view on
this issue and facilitate consensus building during the next phase of the group
also because there might be new arguments coming to the fore.
Thank you for your work so far and, in advance, for the work necessary to
complete the initial report.
Regards,
Chris.
--
Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL,
Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599)
www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon<http://www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|