ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Timeline and notes

  • To: James Galvin <jgalvin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Timeline and notes
  • From: "Dillon, Chris" <c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 14:59:20 +0000

Dear Jim,

Many thanks for sending your comments.

To start to answer your earlier email, there is two-thirds agreement for one 
option, so there will be one. However, we have not had a poll on which option.
There is a discussion going on off-list as to how best to run the poll and its 
possible effect on the timeline.

Regards,

Chris.
--
Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, 
Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) 
www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon<http://www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon>

From: James Galvin [mailto:jgalvin@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 05 December 2014 13:50
To: Dillon, Chris; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Timeline and notes

It seems I provided all of my comments during the meeting yesterday.  
Nonetheless, here is the document with my comments.

Thanks,

Jim

From: James Galvin [mailto:jgalvin@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 04 December 2014 22:22
To: Dillon, Chris; 
gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Timeline and notes

I'm sorry I had to drop off early but I do have a question.

It was looking to me like there was consensus for one recommendation, even 
though we will provide both sides of the argument.  Is that still where we are? 
 If so, which recommendation of the alternatives was chosen?  If so, will be 
publishing one recommendation in the initial report?

I will submit my comments on 6a, some of which you already got because I was 
able to provide them during the call.

Thanks,

Jim
On 12/4/14, 1:35 PM, Dillon, Chris wrote:
Dear colleagues,

As we get closer to the public comment period, I would like to clarify the 
timeline I mentioned towards the end of today's meeting and add a few notes 
about the editing.

Deadlines

  *   Submitting final substantive comments by: Friday, 5 December CoB
  *   Distribution of clean V7: Monday 8 December CoB
  *   Sign off on Initial Report: Thursday 11 December WG call
  *   Opening of Public Comment: Friday 12 December
  *   Closing of Public Comment (6 weeks + 1 week to make up for holidays: 30 
January 2015)
Notes

  *   Nothing in the Initial Report is binding to us or prevents future 
changes/u-turns;
  *   We will not remove arguments for/against mandatory transformation from 
this or the final report;
  *   Public comments received will give us an idea of the community view on 
this issue and facilitate consensus building during the next phase of the group 
also because there might be new arguments coming to the fore.

Thank you for your work so far and, in advance, for the work necessary to 
complete the initial report.

Regards,

Chris.
--
Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, 
Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) 
www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon<http://www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon>




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy