ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] T&T activities over the next couple of weeks

  • To: "James Galvin" <jgalvin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] T&T activities over the next couple of weeks
  • From: "Petter Rindforth" <petter.rindforth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 21:18:14 GMT

Dear All,<div><br /></div><div>Wait and see the responses from some of the 
groups of interest that is curerently working on Comments. </div><div><br 
/></div><div>There will be more specific suggestions both on how to deal with 
the mandatory transformation, as well as to the cost aspect.</div><div><br 
/></div><div>Best,</div><div>Petter<br /><br />-- <br />Petter Rindforth, LL M
<br />
<br />Fenix Legal KB
<br />Stureplan 4c, 4tr
<br />114 35 Stockholm
<br />Sweden
<br />Fax: +46(0)8-4631010
<br />Direct phone: +46(0)702-369360
<br />E-mail: petter.rindforth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<br />www.fenixlegal.eu
<br />
<br />
<br />NOTICE
<br />This e-mail message is intended solely for the individual or individuals 
to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential attorney-client privileged 
information and attorney work product. If the reader of this message is not the 
intended recipient, you are requested not to read, copy or distribute it or any 
of the information it contains. Please delete it immediately and notify us by 
return e-mail.
<br />Fenix Legal KB, Sweden, www.fenixlegal.eu
<br />Thank you<br /><br /><p>7 januari 2015, James Galvin 
&lt;jgalvin@xxxxxxxxxxxx&gt; skrev:</p><blockquote type="cite"><div 
class="oneComWebmail-mail"><div class="oneComWebmail-body"><br />Chris,<br 
/><br />Since our main recommendation is not to propose mandatory 
transformation, would you please clarify if you are proposing a work item for 
us?<br /><br />Speaking for myself, given that I'm not in favor of mandatory 
transformation I'd find it difficult to discuss who should bear the cost of 
transformation.  Since it's not part of the "system" then the only possible 
answer is something or someone outside the system, which could reasonably be 
characterized by the phrase "whoever benefits from the transformation".<br 
/><br />My question is, if we are to talk about who bears the cost, what is the 
basis on which we could evaluate possible responses?<br /><br />Jim<br /><br 
/><br /><br />On 1/7/15 8:12 AM, Dillon, Chris wrote:<br /><blockquote>Dear 
colleagues,<br /><br />Happy New Year!<br /><br />As there have been no public 
comments so far, I would like to cancel our<br />meetings tomorrow (Jan. 8) and 
on Jan. 15, and have a webinar on Monday<br />19th at 15:00 UTC (tentative 
date/time).<br /><br />The current agenda for the webinar is at the bottom of 
this email. You<br />are most welcome to make suggestions for improving it by 
23:59 UTC<br />tomorrow Jan. 8.<br /><br />Two other things:<br /><br />*1. 
Face-to-face meeting in Singapore*<br /><br />The current intention is to have 
a closed meeting, use Doodle to<br />maximize attendance and invite people from 
outside the WG.<br /><br />*2. Charter question 2*<br /><br />Especially if our 
main recommendation were to change to pro-mandatory<br />transformation, we 
would need a detailed answer to the second question<br />in our charter:<br 
/><br />"Who should decide who should bear the burden [of] translating 
contact<br />information to a single common language or transliterating 
contact<br />information to a single common script."<br /><br />Answers that 
have come up during our discussions have included:<br /><br />- Registrants, 
registrars and/or registries<br /><br />- Whoever benefits from the provision 
of a transformation service<br /><br />More detailed suggestions are welcome 
and would be likely to strengthen<br />the case for mandatory 
transformation.<br /><br />With all good wishes for 2015,<br /><br 
/>Regards,<br /><br />Chris.<br /><br />*Draft webinar agenda*<br /><br />1. 
Welcome<br /><br />2. Background to the WG<br /><br />3. Discussion in the 
Group<br /><br />a. SO/AC outreach and feedback<br /><br />b. Gathering of 
arguments<br /><br />c. Straw man<br /><br />d. Initial Report without 
consensus call<br /><br />4. Recommendations<br /><br />a. #1-#6<br /><br />b. 
Pertinence of Charter question 2<br /><br />5. Next steps<br /><br />a. Public 
Comment Period<br /><br />b. Face-to-face meeting in Singapore<br /><br />c. 
Time line for Final Report<br /><br />6. AOB<br /><br />a. WG open to 
everybody<br /><br />b. Confirmation of next call<br /><br />c. Q&A<br /><br 
/>--<br /><br />Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for 
Digital<br />Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 
(int<br />31599) <a target="_blank" 
href="http://www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon";>www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon</a><br
 />&lt;<a target="_blank" 
href="http://www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon";>http://www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon</a>&gt;<br
 /><br /></blockquote></div></div></blockquote></div>


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy