<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] T&T activities over the next couple of weeks
- To: "James Galvin" <jgalvin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] T&T activities over the next couple of weeks
- From: "Petter Rindforth" <petter.rindforth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 21:18:14 GMT
Dear All,<div><br /></div><div>Wait and see the responses from some of the
groups of interest that is curerently working on Comments. </div><div><br
/></div><div>There will be more specific suggestions both on how to deal with
the mandatory transformation, as well as to the cost aspect.</div><div><br
/></div><div>Best,</div><div>Petter<br /><br />-- <br />Petter Rindforth, LL M
<br />
<br />Fenix Legal KB
<br />Stureplan 4c, 4tr
<br />114 35 Stockholm
<br />Sweden
<br />Fax: +46(0)8-4631010
<br />Direct phone: +46(0)702-369360
<br />E-mail: petter.rindforth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<br />www.fenixlegal.eu
<br />
<br />
<br />NOTICE
<br />This e-mail message is intended solely for the individual or individuals
to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential attorney-client privileged
information and attorney work product. If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are requested not to read, copy or distribute it or any
of the information it contains. Please delete it immediately and notify us by
return e-mail.
<br />Fenix Legal KB, Sweden, www.fenixlegal.eu
<br />Thank you<br /><br /><p>7 januari 2015, James Galvin
<jgalvin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> skrev:</p><blockquote type="cite"><div
class="oneComWebmail-mail"><div class="oneComWebmail-body"><br />Chris,<br
/><br />Since our main recommendation is not to propose mandatory
transformation, would you please clarify if you are proposing a work item for
us?<br /><br />Speaking for myself, given that I'm not in favor of mandatory
transformation I'd find it difficult to discuss who should bear the cost of
transformation. Since it's not part of the "system" then the only possible
answer is something or someone outside the system, which could reasonably be
characterized by the phrase "whoever benefits from the transformation".<br
/><br />My question is, if we are to talk about who bears the cost, what is the
basis on which we could evaluate possible responses?<br /><br />Jim<br /><br
/><br /><br />On 1/7/15 8:12 AM, Dillon, Chris wrote:<br /><blockquote>Dear
colleagues,<br /><br />Happy New Year!<br /><br />As there have been no public
comments so far, I would like to cancel our<br />meetings tomorrow (Jan. 8) and
on Jan. 15, and have a webinar on Monday<br />19th at 15:00 UTC (tentative
date/time).<br /><br />The current agenda for the webinar is at the bottom of
this email. You<br />are most welcome to make suggestions for improving it by
23:59 UTC<br />tomorrow Jan. 8.<br /><br />Two other things:<br /><br />*1.
Face-to-face meeting in Singapore*<br /><br />The current intention is to have
a closed meeting, use Doodle to<br />maximize attendance and invite people from
outside the WG.<br /><br />*2. Charter question 2*<br /><br />Especially if our
main recommendation were to change to pro-mandatory<br />transformation, we
would need a detailed answer to the second question<br />in our charter:<br
/><br />"Who should decide who should bear the burden [of] translating
contact<br />information to a single common language or transliterating
contact<br />information to a single common script."<br /><br />Answers that
have come up during our discussions have included:<br /><br />- Registrants,
registrars and/or registries<br /><br />- Whoever benefits from the provision
of a transformation service<br /><br />More detailed suggestions are welcome
and would be likely to strengthen<br />the case for mandatory
transformation.<br /><br />With all good wishes for 2015,<br /><br
/>Regards,<br /><br />Chris.<br /><br />*Draft webinar agenda*<br /><br />1.
Welcome<br /><br />2. Background to the WG<br /><br />3. Discussion in the
Group<br /><br />a. SO/AC outreach and feedback<br /><br />b. Gathering of
arguments<br /><br />c. Straw man<br /><br />d. Initial Report without
consensus call<br /><br />4. Recommendations<br /><br />a. #1-#6<br /><br />b.
Pertinence of Charter question 2<br /><br />5. Next steps<br /><br />a. Public
Comment Period<br /><br />b. Face-to-face meeting in Singapore<br /><br />c.
Time line for Final Report<br /><br />6. AOB<br /><br />a. WG open to
everybody<br /><br />b. Confirmation of next call<br /><br />c. Q&A<br /><br
/>--<br /><br />Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for
Digital<br />Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599
(int<br />31599) <a target="_blank"
href="http://www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon">www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon</a><br
/><<a target="_blank"
href="http://www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon">http://www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon</a>><br
/><br /></blockquote></div></div></blockquote></div>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|