<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] MP3 Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP WG meeting - 26 February 2015
- To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] MP3 Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP WG meeting - 26 February 2015
- From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 23:29:50 +0000
Dear All,
Please find the MP3 recording for the Translation and Transliteration of
Contact Information PDP Working Group call held on Thursday 26 February 2015
at 14:00 UTC at:
http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-transliteration-contact-26feb15-en.mp3
On page:
http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#feb
The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO
Master Calendar page:
http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/
Attendees:
Chris Dillon – NCSG
Jim Galvin - RySG
Amr Elsadr – NCUC
Ubolthip Sethakaset – Individual
Rudi Vansnick – NPOC
Jennifer Chung – RySG
Roger Carney – RrSG
Peter Green – NCUC
Sara Bockey – RrSG
Pitinan Kooarmornpatana – GAC
Wanawit Ahkuputra - GAC
Wen Zhai - RySG
Apologies:
Emily Taylor – RrSG
Petter Rindforth – IPC
Peter Dernbach- IPC
Julie Hedlund - Staff
ICANN staff:
Howard Li
Lars Hoffmann
Glen de Saint Géry
Gisella Gruber
** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list **
Wiki page: http://tinyurl.com/mpwxstx
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Glen
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://gnso.icann.org
Adobe Chat Transcript for Thursday 26 February 2015:
Pitinan Kooarmornpatana:็Hi all,
Gisella Gruber:Welcome to the Translation and Transliteration Contact
Information PDP WG on Thursday 26 February 2015 at 1400 UTC
Pitinan Kooarmornpatana:Hi Hi :)
Pitinan Kooarmornpatana:somehow I cannot connect to the local Mic.only the dial
up option available
Chris Dillon:Hello Pitinan & Wanawit!
Lars Hoffmann:hello all
Chris Dillon:Hi Lars!
Pitinan Kooarmornpatana:ah need to try log in agian
Pitinan Kooarmornpatana:brb
Jennifer Chung:Hello everyone!
Gisella Gruber:@ Pitinan - the mic has been enabled so you should be able to
speak through your computer mic
Glen de Saint Gery:Rudi will be late joining
Pitinan Kooarmornpatana:Thanks :) I thought it was my mic problem for a while ,
thanks!
Howard Li:I am on listen only mode
Lars Hoffmann:@howard: would you like a dial out?
Howard Li:this is Howard Li, ICANN Staff, Registrar Services
Howard Li:I am OK on listen only mode
Glen de Saint Gery:Apologies from Julie Hedlund as well
Amr Elsadr:@Glen: Hope all's well with Julie.
Amr Elsadr:Ah. Thanks. I'll check the wiki.
Amr Elsadr:Is what we're looking at here an updated version?
Jim Galvin:Jim is now on the call. Sorry to be late.
Amr Elsadr:Can the document be desynched please?
Lars Hoffmann:@amr - done
Amr Elsadr:Thanks.
Amr Elsadr::)
Rudi Vansnick:welcome Jim and others of course ... sorry for myself being late
Jim Galvin:The intent of the email address is to ensure contactability.
Jim Galvin:However, there are practical issues, as you note Chris
Peter Green (CONAC):Sorry for being late too, lose connectivity
Rudi Vansnick:Amr: +1
Wen Zhai:I'm terribly sorry that i am late.
Rudi Vansnick:no problem Wen, welcome anyway
Wen Zhai:Good evening to everyone.
Amr Elsadr:Hi Wen Zhai.
Wen Zhai:Good evening Amr.
Pitinan Kooarmornpatana:hi :)
Amr Elsadr:Looks like the RrSG/RySG are also trying to shift the cost to some
easy to us automated solution. :)
Amr Elsadr:*easy to use
Rudi Vansnick:easy to use not equal to quality which is important in
the context of value of the data to third parties
Amr Elsadr:Yes Rudi. Certainly. :)
Rudi Vansnick:i would propose we clearly indicate there are free tools but
without any guarantee
Amr Elsadr:I believe the answer to question 50 is out of scope of this PDP.
We're only chartered to determine wether it's desirable to transform, not how.
Jim Galvin:+1 Amr
Pitinan Kooarmornpatana:+1 Amr for the translation part
Pitinan Kooarmornpatana:but for the cost , i do think it's not really about
fee, but the liabilities
Pitinan Kooarmornpatana:i mean not only about fee, but also the liabilities
Rudi Vansnick:@Pitinan : you're right ... fee is less critical then the
translated value
Jim Galvin:I think the issue the RrSG/RySG are getting at is the feasibility of
doing it, which is mostly out of scope for us but I do think we get to speak to
this issue generally.
Amr Elsadr:@Chris: Agreed, but limiting our answer to why we believe it is
desirable or not.
Jennifer Chung:+1 Jim
Amr Elsadr:@Pitinan: +1
Jim Galvin:A characteristic of "desirable" is whether or not it is feasible.
Amr Elsadr:Yes, Jim. Absolutely. :)
Jim Galvin:That's the level at which we get to speak to the question of "how".
Amr Elsadr:That's what I meant in my response to Chris. :)
Pitinan Kooarmornpatana:for #51, I think 1. yes the validity translation will
need people, at least for many years for now. 2. and the tranformed address
need to be agreeed by the Data Owner --> registrant
Sara Bockey:+1 Rudi
Pitinan Kooarmornpatana:+1 with Rudi, and +1 with Amr earlier with the focus on
'who should decide'
Rudi Vansnick:maybe it is something we need to put in the beginning of our
report information
Rudi Vansnick:no comments ;-)
Pitinan Kooarmornpatana:I start to think it's really no point transforming.
because:If we need it unofficially, then it could be easily transformed by free
tool without guarantee. And If we need it officially, then we need the
validated one, in whatever lanauge.
Amr Elsadr:Was disconnected for a minute, but wanted to support Rudi's last
comment. If a policy recommendation we make required contracted parties to send
registrant contact data to 3rd parties conflicts with some local privacy laws,
this might prove problematic. Another good reason why transformation may be
undesirable. :)
Amr Elsadr:Sending could also mean cross-boarder transfer of data. From
jurisdictions with higher data privacy laws to others with lower ones.
Pitinan Kooarmornpatana:+1 with Amr , interesting issue
Amr Elsadr:This is an ongoing issue with the implementation of the "thick"
whois policy.
Amr Elsadr:There is an ongoing legal review being performed.
Amr Elsadr:I think withholding consent is refering to publication of the
transformed data.
Amr Elsadr:This is another policy question that needs to be answered, but not
by this PDP.
Rudi Vansnick:refers back to the previous points ... and if today the WHOIS is
changed there are also updates done
Amr Elsadr:@Rudi: Technically we could add to their responsibilites, but they
obviously don't want us to. I don't want us to either, in the absence of good
reasons why we should.
Rudi Vansnick:@Amr: +1
Pitinan Kooarmornpatana:+1 Amr
Jim Galvin:@Amr +1 - I would add that the change needs to be logged and tracked.
Jim Galvin:@Chris - validating the transformation is reasonable but that's a
different thing then what is referred to here.
Pitinan Kooarmornpatana:@Jim, only if there is some standard way of transforming
Jim Galvin:Yes, I meant "a reasonable topic for discussion" not that I meant it
was reasonable to do. :-)
Amr Elsadr:Ah. Thanks Jim. :)
Pitinan Kooarmornpatana:i c
Howard Li:thank you!
Sara Bockey:Thank you
Pitinan Kooarmornpatana:Thank you all
Amr Elsadr:Thanks all. Bye.
Jim Galvin:Thanks! Bye!
Pitinan Kooarmornpatana:bye
Wanawit Ahkuputra GAC:Sawasdee
Chris Dillon:Goodbye all.
Rudi Vansnick:goodbye till next week
Peter Green (CONAC):bye all
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|