ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Final version and call for consensus

  • To: Rudi Vansnick <rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx>, "Dillon, Chris" <c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Final version and call for consensus
  • From: Justine Chew <justine.chew@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 23:19:22 +0800

Dear Chris, Rudi,

I am re-reading Final Report T&T.docx and while in my opinion, everything
is substantially in order, there are some formatting issues and spelling
errors for your attention:

1. Table of Contents - section 6. Community Input has renumbered itself to
1. and so forth.

2. Chapter 1.1 Background - the open inverted comma that appears towards
the end of the 4th line is missing is close counterpart. This perhaps
should appear at the end of Chapter 1.1, ie. end of the 2nd bullet?

3. Chapter 1.3 Recommendation #3 on pg 4 - is reference to 'ccTLD' meant to
be included considering that our mission and scope only pertains to contact
information with respect to gTLDs? Where else is 'ccTLD' mentioned except
as a supporting example on pg 16? I thought our debate centered purely on

4. Chapter 1.3 Recommendation #4 on pg 4 - 'policies' on the 4th line is
mis-spelt. Also the 2nd sentence on the 4th line seems to be 'hanging',
perhaps prefix it with "It is also assured that ....."?

5. Chapter 1.3 Recommendation #6 on pg 4 - the part of the sentence
beginning on the 3rd line reads funny. May I suggest it be reworded to read
as "... and its linguistic/script capacity expanded for receiving, ......"?

6. Chapter 1.3 Last paragraph on pg 4 - should be '... the question of who
should decide who should bear ....' i.e the words 'of who' have been

7. Chapter 1.4 - I know that the Working Group has been abbreviated to (WG)
in para 1.2 but I think no where else is the abbreviation of WG used in
this document except for in chapter 1.4 - so can I please be pedantic and
ask that the 2 references to 'WG' - one in each paragraph - be amended to
'Working Group'?

8. Chapter 3 - suffers the same issue as in Chapter 1.1 i.e. missing
closing inverted comma in 1st para.

9. Chapter 4 on pg 9 2nd para - to remove the word 'some' on the 4th line.

10. End of Chapter 5.1.2 on pg 17 - perhaps add the words 'although the
Working Group did not come to a conclusion as to who should decide who
should bear the said burden.' to properly address our non-answering of
Charter Q2.

11. Chapter 5.1.3 on pg 17 - the word 'borne' is mis-spelt; appears twice
in the 2nd paragraph.

12. Chapter 5.2.1 on pg 18 para 1 - 'losslessly'? You mean 'loosely'?

13. Chapter 5.2.2 Recommendation #3 on pg 19 - see point 3 above, take out
reference to 'ccTLD'?

14. Chapter 5.2.2 Recommendation #4 on pg 19 - see point 4 above,
'policies' is mis-spelt.

15. Chapter 5.2.2 Recommendation $6 on top of pg 20 - see point 5 above.

16. End of Chapter 5.2.2 re Charter Q2 - see point 6 above.

I take it that the rest of the document contains text copied from a
reliable source. Also that Annex B is the same copy that was finalised

Once again, I thank you for your hard work and dedication in leading the WG
to this Final Report.

Kind regards,

Justine Chew

On 10 June 2015 at 20:56, Rudi Vansnick <rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Dear working group members,
> As co-chairs of the Translation and Transliteration Working Group, Chris
> Dillon and I have reached the following conclusions:
> 1.       All public comments have been reviewed and discussed by the WG
> and a number of amendments were made to the Initial Report - as agreed to
> by members of the Working Group.
> 2.       There have been no objections to the Final Report communicated
> on the WG list it was first sent to the WG on 5 June 2015 at 06:50 UTC with
> a final response deadline of Tuesday 9 June 23:59 UTC.
> 3.       Therefore, we determine that the Working Group has reached full
> consensus on the Final Report as attached in clean and redline versions,
> noting that the redline version highlights all edits made to the Initial
> Report that was published for public comment in December 2015.
> All WG participants have until 12:00 UTC (noon) on Thursday 11 June 2015
> to object to the ‘full consensus’ call by the co-chairs.  If anyone
> objects, please explain your reasons.  If no one objects in the allotted
> time, the report will be sent by our Council Liaison to the GNSO Council
> for their action along with a draft motion for its approval.
> If anyone has any questions, please feel free to ask.
> Rudi Vansnick
> Chair Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC)
> www.npoc.org
> rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxxx
> Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16
> Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy