Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED!

[Emily Taylor <emily.taylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Lars

Thank you for your note.

I confirm my consent to the change.

Kind regards

Emily

On 21 June 2015 at 04:08, Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  Dear all,
> Please find Jennifer's consent below.
> Best. Lars
>
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>  *From:* "Jennifer Chung" <jen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Date:* 20 Jun 2015 20:10:00 GMT-3
> *To:* "'Lars Hoffmann'" <lars.hoffmann@xxxxxxxxx>, <
> gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
> *Subject:* *Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to
> Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED!*
>
>   Dear Lars,
>
>
>
> Since I still haven’t received the email from the mailing list – might be
> a subscription problem?  I would like to record my consent to the change
> suggested in your email below (pasted in its entirety).
>
>
>
> Also in the case that this does not make it to the mailing list
> (subscription problem?) please forward my response to the list.  Thank you!
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
>
> [image: dotasia-signature]
>
> *Jennifer Chung*, *Policy & Organisational Relations*
>
> DotAsia Organisation <http://www.dot.asia/>, From.Asia / For.Asia
>
> E-mail: jen@xxxxxxxx
>
> Skype: jennifer.r.chung
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------
>
> Dear all,
>
>  Please all read this careful and try to reply on list as soon as
> possible.
>
>  It has come to our attention that there was an important term mistakenly
>
> used in Recommendation #4 of our Final Report
>
>  The Recommendation reads currently:
>
>  Recommendation #4 The Working Group recommends that, regardless of the
>
> language(s)/script(s) used, it is assured that the data fields are
>
> consistent to standards in the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA),
>
> relevant L Policy, Additional Whois Information Policy (AWIP) and any other
>
> applicable polices. Entered contact information data are verified, in
>
> accordance with the aforementioned Policies and Agreements and the
>
> language/script used must be easily identifiable.
>
> Level of consensus: Full Consensus
>
>  The term Œverified¹ in the second sentence of the recommendation has
> legal
>
> implications and would change significantly the contractual obligations of
>
> the Contracted Parties. As the substance of the Final Report on that
>
> particular issue makes it clear that "validation" was intended to be used
>
> instead of ³verification². Both  co-Chairs agree that this is a clerical
>
> mistake as the Group meant to use the term Œvalidate¹ not Œverifiy¹ and it
>
> should be changed accordingly.
>
>  With your consent we would like change the working to reflect the actual
>
> meaning of what the Group meant to recommend. In order to prevent delaying
>
> the GNSO Council¹s vote on our Final Report, this would have to happen as
>
> soon as possible so that the Motion to adopt can be changed accordingly and
>
> in time for Wednesday¹s Council discussion and vote.
>
>  Many thanks and best wishes,
>
> Lars
>
>
>
>
>



-- 

Emily Taylor

*MA(Cantab), MBA*
Director

*Netistrar Ltd *- Domain Names at Trade Prices
W: http://www.netistrar.com | M: 07540 049322 | T: 01283 617808



Repton House, Bretby Business Park, Bretby, Derbyshire, DE15 0YZ
Registered in England and Wales No. 08735583. VAT No. 190062332