RE: [gnso-dow123] Action point summary of WHOIS TF call - 3May 2005

["Maria Farrell" <maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx>]

Milton - these summaries are simply records of 'to do' lists to help people
remember what tasks need to be done.  I am sure that Glen will capture your
statement in the minutes of the meeting.

I don't mean to be unaccommodating but;

1- The action point summaries are a fast-glance set of decisions and actions
to help people get on quickly with what they've agreed to do, and let
everyone else know what to expect.  They don't include statements per se.
Any reference to discussion is minimal and only what is absolutely necessary
to explain the actions.  I am not going to start preparing them with all the
political sensitivities of minutes - it defeats the purpose of the exercise,
makes it take much longer, and is redundant. 

2 - I think your point has been made in your email below, making it
unnecessary to change the list of actions decided in any case. 

All the best, Maria


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Milton Mueller
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 5:09 PM
To: gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] Action point summary of WHOIS TF call - 3May 2005

Maria:
In your recap of the accuracy discussion (2 Review of accuracy topic),
please add my statement that it is our belief that it is inappropriate to do
anything concrete on accuracy until the privacy issues are addressed. 

>>> "Maria Farrell" <maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx> 5/4/2005 12:25:39 PM >>>
 
2          Review of accuracy topic

Jordyn re-capped Bruce Tonkin's note on the Capetown discussions as a
starting point for the call.  The procedure outlined in Bruce's notes
focused on a complaint-initiated process for checking accuracy of Whois
information.  Bruce's notes also mentioned the possibility of fast-track
procedures  - similar to notice and takedown in the US DMCA - but this was
seen as outside the scope of the task force and of ICANN. 

 

Ross Rader, Tim Ruiz and Tom Keller outlined their companies' procedures for
responding to complaints of inaccurate Whois data and answered questions.
TF members identified areas in which current practices and policies may need
revision.

 

 

Points agreed:

The possibility for an external fast-track procedure * i.e. within the
national law context and in cases where harm would be done during the 2 x 15
day accuracy checking process - should not be prevented by TF policy
recommendations . 

 

Task force members will explore standardized procedures for:

Ø      The number and type of registrant contact details used to pursue
inaccuracy complaints before a name is put on hold or deleted,

Ø      Validating responses to requests for updated data,

Ø       Directing all accuracy-related complaints to the ICANN Whois data
reporting system. 

 

 

Actions:

 

*       Ross Rader and Tim Ruiz to try and find information about the number
of deleted names arising from inaccurate Whois information. 
*       Maria Farrell to provide information on the Whois data reporting
process, i.e. numbers of complaints and outcomes.   
*       Ross Rader and Steve Metalitz to draft language on standardized
procedures and circulate to the list. 

 

 

3          Next week's topic - tiered access

 

Actions:

*       Task force members are encouraged to submit ideas on accuracy to the
list to help next week's discussion. 
*       Jordyn will review previous Task Force 1 work and forward any
relevant information to the list.