RE: [gnso-dow123] Action point summary of WHOIS TF call - 3May 2005

["Maria Farrell" <maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx>]

OK, well in future I'll be careful of things I note under 'decisions'. 

Cheers, Maria

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Vittorio Bertola [mailto:vb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 4:04 PM
To: Maria Farrell
Cc: Milton Mueller; gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123] Action point summary of WHOIS TF call - 3May 2005

Il giorno gio, 05-05-2005 alle 18:14 +0200, Maria Farrell ha scritto:
> Milton - these summaries are simply records of 'to do' lists to help 
> people remember what tasks need to be done.  I am sure that Glen will 
> capture your statement in the minutes of the meeting.
>
> I don't mean to be unaccommodating but;

Maria, I wasn't on the call, but if I understand well Milton's objection, he
was trying to say that he does not think that this:

> Task force members will explore standardized procedures for:
> 
> Ø      The number and type of registrant contact details used to pursue
> inaccuracy complaints before a name is put on hold or deleted,
> 
> Ø      Validating responses to requests for updated data,
> 
> Ø       Directing all accuracy-related complaints to the ICANN Whois data
> reporting system. 

was a point agreed.

In fact, personally speaking, I do not agree to any further accuracy
enforcement measure being explored, until someone explains to me clearly
what problem it is meant to address. Actually, I don't see how you can
decide any norm on whether, say, a response to an update request is valid,
before you clarify what problem are you addressing, i.e. what these data are
to be used for and in what situation.
-- 
vb.             [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<-----
http://bertola.eu.org/  <- Prima o poi...