<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-dow123] FW: Final Whois Task Force report on Recommendation 1 - improving notification and consent
- To: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] FW: Final Whois Task Force report on Recommendation 1 - improving notification and consent
- From: "Jordyn A. Buchanan" <jordyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 11:51:11 -0400
Tim:
I think this is just a parsing issue with the sentence, although in
retrospect it probably could have been more clear. The intent is for
something that probably reads more like this:
"There was not universal agreement in the task force on the inclusion
of these issues, nor that all of these issues are worthy of further
consideration, and this list is not intended to be exhaustive". I'll
be on the council call on Thursday and make this clear.
Jordyn
On May 28, 2005, at 11:04 AM, Tim Ruiz wrote:
All,
Regarding the implementation issues document, it says in the opening
paragraph:
"These issues are not agreed on by everyone in the task force, all
issues are worthy of further consideration and the list is not
exhaustive."
That is not exactly how I recall it. The second phrase of this
sentence
contradicts the first. I thought part of the disagreement over
including these issues was that not everyone believed they were worth
further consideration. I think either of the following two suggestions
more accurately captures what was agreed to:
1. These issues are not agreed on by everyone in the task force,
and the
list is not exhaustive.
OR
2. These issues are not agreed on by everyone in the task force and
not
all agree that these issues are worthy of further consideration, and
the list is not exhaustive.
Tim
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [gnso-dow123] FW: Final Whois Task Force report on
Recommendation 1 - improving notification and consent
From: "Maria Farrell" <maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, May 26, 2005 2:52 pm
To: gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dear all,
FYI below is the message that went to the GNSO Council enclosing the
final task force report and the list of potential implementation
issues/questions.
All the best, Maria
From: Maria Farrell [mailto:maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 9:42 PM
To: 'owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: Final Whois Task Force report on Recommendation 1 - improving
notification and consent
Dear all,
Attached is the Final Task Force Report on recommendations for
improving notification and consent for the use of contact data in the
Whois system. I am submitting this report to you on behalf of the
Combined WHOIS Task Force (1, 2, 3) of the GNSO Council. The
Combined Whois Task Force has continued the work of Task Force 2 whose
terms of reference (29 October 2003) included the task of determining;
"What is the best way to inform registrants of what information about
themselves is made publicly available when they register a domain name
and ... and receive notification of its use?" In addition, during
the combined task force's discussions, a number of implementation
issues were identified as possibly appropriate for consideration by an
implementation group, if the Council chooses to form such a group.
This
list is attached with the caveats that the issues are not agreed on by
everyone in the task force, are all worthy of further consideration
and
the list is not exhaustive. Best regards, Maria
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|