Re: [Fwd: Re: [gnso-dow123] Note to council on Notice recommendation]
- To: "Mansourkia, Magnolia (Maggie)" <maggie.mansourkia@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [gnso-dow123] Note to council on Notice recommendation]
- From: Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 12:35:58 -0400
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 16/08/2005 12:31 PM Mansourkia, Magnolia (Maggie) noted that;
> I have reviewed the minutes but not the recording. I understand the
> question, but it may be that we disagree that the only options are to
> proceed full steam ahead or bring the recommendation to a halt.
I'm only concerned if the default action is to proceed towards
implementation. There are any number of ways that we can find answers to
these questions without reversing the recommendations, none of which I'm
particularly wed to.
> The substance of my point is that reversal of notice provisions which
> are currently in the agreement was not part of the task force terms of
> reference. Thus, I'm uncomfortable with the approach of making a
> request to put this issue before the task force, given the work load we
> already have tasked to us.
I agree that this would probably better be settled by a resolution of
council either to a) create a council level committee to look at the
issue or b) reconstitute the old TF or create a new one to make further
recommendations or c) refer it to staff for analysis.
We do have a lot on our plate.
Contact info: http://www.blogware.com/profiles/ross
Skydasher: A great way to start your day
My weblog: http://www.byte.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----