RE: [gnso-dow123] Proposed revision #1

["Steve Metalitz" <metalitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I assume that if Tom's proposal is followed (as noted in a separate
posting, I can accept all but one of the proposed changes), then the
specific questions to be posed on each of the issues would be circulated
to the group with ample opportunity to comment or suggest revisions.   

Steve       

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Thomas Keller
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 4:32 AM
To: Jordyn A. Buchanan
Cc: Whois TF mailing list
Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] Proposed revision #1

Jordyn,

thanks for all the work. Having considered the proposed changes I would
suggest that we leave the recommendation in its original wording and
simply add the changes as questions for the public commenting period and
finalize the preliminary report.

tom

Am 30.08.2005 schrieb Jordyn A. Buchanan:
> This is the first in a series of e-mails to take up the revisions that

> have been suggested by various constituencies.  We discussed this 
> first change at length today.
> 
> I think we are closest to agreement on language that makes exceptions 
> applicable to all registrars that the conflict applies to (as opposed
> to all registrars, or to just the registrar making the request).   
> Here's some specific text to discuss.  Paragraph 2 (c) of the policy 
> recommendation would be changed to the following (insertion marked in 
> bold italics):
> 
> c.  Providing a mechanism for the recognition, if appropriate, in   
> circumstances where the conflict cannot be otherwise resolved, of an 
> exception to contractual obligations to those registries/registrars to

> which the specific conflict applies with regard to collection, display

> and distribution of personally identifiable data via Whois; and
> 
> Similarly, sub-paragraph iv of Step Three would be replaced with the 
> following (changes marked in bold italics again):
> 
> Recommendation of how the issue should be resolved, which may include 
> whether ICANN should provide an exception for those registrars/ 
> registries to which the specific conflict applies from one or more 
> identified WHOIS contractual provisions. The report should include a 
> detailed justification of its recommendation, including the 
> anticipated impact on the operational stability, reliability, 
> security, or global interoperability of the Internet's unique 
> identifier systems if the recommendation were to be approved or
denied.
> 

Gruss,

tom

(__)        
(OO)_____  
(oo)    /|\     A cow is not entirely full of
  | |--/ | *    milk some of it is hamburger!
  w w w  w