RE: [gnso-dow123] Proposed change #7

["Steve Metalitz" <metalitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

We make no such presumption.   

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Milton Mueller
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 12:06 PM
To: jordyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] Proposed change #7

NCUC would suggest replacing this change with a Sunset provision. In
other words, the whole procedure should go out of existence after three
years (time period subject to discussion). As the title suggests, an
"exceptions" procedure presumes that Whois policy as a whole is out of
whack with privacy law, but ongoing reform of Whois might change this.
Therefore, there may be no need for an exceptions procedure down the
road. 

>>> "Jordyn A. Buchanan" <jordyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 08/30/05 5:22 PM >>>
This change is from the ISPCP.  This change would add a new Step Six to
the guidance on the procedure.  The new section would read as
follows:

Step Six:  Ongoing Review

With substantial input from the relevant registries or registrars,
together with all constituencies, there should be a review of the pros
and cons of how the process worked, and the development of revisions
designed to make the process better and more efficient, should the need
arise again at some point in the future.