Re: [gnso-dow123] Proposed change #7

["Jordyn A. Buchanan" <jordyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

This approach is really just pushing off the problem for later.   
Since we delayed the publication of the report for a week in order to  
try to decide which of the changes the TF found acceptable, I don't  
believe we should take the blanket position that we're not going to  
accept any of these changes (including those that seem to have broad  
or unanimous support).  Let's make some use of this week and identify  
the areas where we can make changes prior to publishing this.  That  
way we can focus public comments on the areas where there may be  
significant outstanding issues.

Jordyn


On Aug 31, 2005, at 12:41 PM, Tim Ruiz wrote:

> Perhaps I misunderstood Tom's intent on his response to #1. I took  
> his comment/suggestion to refer to ALL changes. Leave the  
> recommendation as is, add the constituency statements to the  
> report, etc.. In any case, that's what I was agreeing with.
>
> Tim
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123] Proposed change #7
> From: "Mansourkia, Magnolia (Maggie)" <maggie.mansourkia@xxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, August 31, 2005 10:56 am
> To: "Mansourkia, Magnolia (Maggie)" <maggie.mansourkia@xxxxxxx>, Steve
> Metalitz <metalitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Jordyn A. Buchanan"
> <jordyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Whois TF mailing list
> <gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Sorry folks.  I missed one, so I have slight a revision.
>
> I agree with Tom on #1 (leave it as is and open it for comment).   
> Disagree with change #2 since we have not yet taken up the tiered  
> access issue, and accept all remaining proposals.
>
> Thanks,
> Maggie
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso- 
> dow123@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mansourkia, Magnolia (Maggie)
> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 11:52 AM
> To: Steve Metalitz; Jordyn A. Buchanan; Whois TF mailing list
> Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123] Proposed change #7
>
> Same here.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso- 
> dow123@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve Metalitz
> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 11:09 AM
> To: Jordyn A. Buchanan; Whois TF mailing list
> Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123] Proposed change #7
>
> I could support (or at least accept) all 7 of the changes, except #2.
>
> Steve Metalitz
>
> From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso- 
> dow123@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jordyn A. Buchanan
> Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 5:23 PM
> To: Whois TF mailing list
> Subject: [gnso-dow123] Proposed change #7
>
> This change is from the ISPCP.  This change would add a new Step  
> Six to the guidance on the procedure.  The new section would read  
> as follows:
>
> Step Six:  Ongoing Review
> With substantial input from the relevant registries or registrars,  
> together with all constituencies, there should be a review of the  
> pros and cons of how the process worked, and the development of  
> revisions designed to make the process better and more efficient,  
> should the need arise again at some point in the future.[JAB1]
>  [JAB1]