Re: [gnso-dow123] Proposed revision #2

["David W. Maher" <dmaher@xxxxxxx>]

As stated in the preamble:
"The Task Force believes that there is an ongoing risk of conflict 
between a registrar's or registry's legal obligations under local 
privacy laws and their contractual obligations to ICANN.  TF2 Report, 
Section 2.3, 
http://www.gnso.icann.org/issues/whois-privacy/Whois-tf2-preliminary.html.

We are looking for procedures to reduce or eliminate the conflict. If 
we restrict ourselves to making all (or some) data publicly 
available, or concealing all (or some) data, we will never reach a 
consensus. Tiered access as a concept is an obvious way forward to 
find some consensus to solve this problem.
David



At 11:55 AM 8/31/2005, Ross Rader wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 30/08/2005 5:08 PM Jordyn A. Buchanan noted that;
> > This proposal is from the Registry Constituency.  It would add an
> > additional paragraph to the end of the policy recommendation, as  follows:
> >
> > 3) Registrars and registries may use tiered access as a means of
> > complying with local legal requirements when applicable.
>
> We've not had any discussions regarding tiered access. It would be
> appropriate to eliminate this from the draft and keep this discussion
> off the table until we are in a position to deal with the technical and
> policy issues surrounding the proposal.
>
> - --
> - --
> Regards,
>
>
>
>                        -rwr
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>                 "Every contrivance of man, every tool, every instrument,
>                  every utensil, every article designed for use, of each
>                  and every kind, evolved from very simple beginnings."
>                         - Robert Collier
>
>
> Got Blog? http://www.blogware.com
> My Blogware: http://www.byte.org
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)
>
> iD8DBQFDFeD96sL06XjirooRApR8AJwKsJTOSOEzIoGKGn1hLYUKXmBz6wCfXjbK
> 7B69eqPzWPqzLOH0dCYzfEU=
> =vgqi
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----