<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-dow123] Emailing: 2100-9588_22-5986553.htm
- To: "Anthony Harris" <harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Bret Fausett" <bfausett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123] Emailing: 2100-9588_22-5986553.htm
- From: "Paul Stahura" <stahura@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 17:36:47 -0800
All 1.8M domains are probably not registered by 1.8M different people.
They could all be registered by the a single (or a few) bad actor(s)
Or the rest may have "falsified" their whois for privacy concerns.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Anthony Harris
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 10:55 AM
To: Bret Fausett; gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] Emailing: 2100-9588_22-5986553.htm
Bret,
If these percentages are correct, then in the case of gTLD
registrations, and if we take a number of 35 million gTLD
registrations as a ball park figure (I am probably a little off
mark), that would mean 5.14% would be equivalent to
1.799.000 registrations with 'patently false data in at least
one of the required whois fields' ?
As a percentage granted it may not be significant; as an array
of potential law infringement and abuse perpetrators, the
number might raise some concern?
Tony Harris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bret Fausett" <bfausett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 3:17 PM
Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] Emailing: 2100-9588_22-5986553.htm
>I think it's also worth noting that according to the GAO report, only
> 5.14% of gTLD registrations have patently false data in at least one
of
> the required whois fields and only 3.64% of registrations have
> incomplete data in at least one of the required whois fields. The
press
> seems to be reporting this as "rampant" false data, but quite frankly
I
> was stunned by how low those numbers are. I would have expected them
to
> be significantly higher.
>
> Bret
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|