<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-dow123] Final Preliminary TF Report on purpose of Whois & Whois contacts
- To: <jordyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx>, <metalitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123] Final Preliminary TF Report on purpose of Whois & Whois contacts
- From: "Milton Mueller" <Mueller@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:21:50 -0500
I have to seize this rare opportunity to agree with Steve. The report as it
stands states which constituency supports which Whois purpose formulation. What
would we be voting on?
>>> "Steve Metalitz" <metalitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 1/12/2006 1:54 PM >>>
Why are we voting? Doesn't the report already state which constituency
supports which formulation? I thought the idea was to have a
preliminary report that we would support unanimously.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Jordyn Buchanan
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 1:33 PM
To: Maria Farrell
Cc: gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] Final Preliminary TF Report on purpose of
Whois & Whois contacts
Thanks, Maria.
I'd also like to kick off voting by e-mail in the hopes we can get it
wrapped up rapidly as well.
Please send to Maria and myself (and the list if you'd like) an e-mail
indicating whether you support one or the other of the formulations, or
both, or neither. We will log each participating task force members'
vote and include it with the published report.
Jordyn
On 1/12/06, Maria Farrell <maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Ahead of next week's task force meeting, attached is the revised and
> final (barring further task force discussions, of course) Preliminary
> Task Force Report on the Purpose of Whois and of the Whois Contacts.
> It incorporates Kathy's comments from yesterday as there were no
> objections to them on the list.
> It will be published on the website in both a html and .pdf version.
> All the best, Maria
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|