<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-dow123] proposal on collection of contact data
- To: tim@xxxxxxxxxxx, gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] proposal on collection of contact data
- From: KathrynKL@xxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 10:39:23 EST
Tim:
Can we make a phone date for a fast call to talk about the issues you raise
and the data that is collected? Happy to stick to a time limit (10-15
minutes).
Regards, Kathy
>
> I'm trying to understand your proposal, which centers on data collection.
> I'm confused about how I as a registrar would then determine who has the
> right
> to perform non-technical functions for the domain name, such as a transfer to
> another registrar, transfer to another registered name holder, deletion of
> the domain name, etc.. The individual or organization that facilitates the
> purchase or registration of a domain name is not always the intended
> registered
> name holder.
>
> It is important that we don't confuse the individual or organization who
> facilitates the purchase or registration with the individual or organization
> that becomes the registered name holder.
>
>
> Tim Ruiz
> VP, Domain Services
> The Go Daddy Group, Inc.
> Office: 319-294-3940
> Fax: 480-247-4516
> tim@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> >> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: [gnso-dow123] proposal on collection of contact data
>> From: KathrynKL@xxxxxxx
>> Date: Sun, January 29, 2006 9:16 pm
>> To: gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> Attached please find a statement from the NCUC. I guess the word proposal
>> is appropriate.
>>
>> Our goal here is to submit that the TF must examine the data collected for
>> the Whois database. Regardless of the formulation we pick, we must address
>> the issue of whether the data collected for the Whois database is
>> appropriate. Publication is one issue; collection is another.
>>
>>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|