[gnso-dow123] Re: Meeting Tuesday?

["Jordyn Buchanan" <jordyn.buchanan@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Steve:

As you have (hopefully) seen, the proposed final report was mailed to
the list this morning, so we will have a call tomorrow and discuss it.

If people have suggested edits, it may be helpful to make them on the
list prior to tomorrow's call.

Jordyn

On 3/5/06, Steve Metalitz <metalitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  Has any draft final report been circulated yet?  If not, aren't we in
> the same position as we were last week?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Jordyn Buchanan
> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 12:25 PM
> To: KathrynKL@xxxxxxx
> Cc: Jordyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-dow123] Re: Do we need a meeting tomorrow?
>
> Kathy:
>
> I think you are correct.  Since we do not yet have a copy of the final
> report, we will defer tomorrow's call until March 7.  On the agenda we
> will discuss the NCUC proposal as well as the final report, with the
> intention of voting on and finalizing the final report.
>
> Glen--can you update the invitations for everonye?
>
> Jordyn
>
> On 2/27/06, KathrynKL@xxxxxxx <KathrynKL@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Jordyn:
> >  I took a closer look at the agenda and realized that it contains only
>
> > the NCUC proposal.  Originally, we conceived of this meeting as one to
>
> > discuss the NCUC Proposal and our revised Purpose of Whois Report.
> > Because it is not on the agenda, I take it that the Report is still
> > being revised (which makes sense in light of the many recent
> happenings).
> >
> >  Might I suggest that we try again to do both next week?  I don't know
>
> > if we need a special meeting solely to discuss the NCUC Proposal
> > (which is a procedural one kicking in after Council decides on
> > purpose).  As much as I like meeting with everyone, it is fine by me
> to wait.
> >
> >  Regards, Kathy
>
>