RE: [gnso-dow123] Attached! Preliminary tf Report Purpose Whois and Whois con...

["Steve Metalitz" <metalitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree with Kathy's proposal and would associate myself with David and
Tony's postings as well.  At a minimum another week would provide time
for the staff to fairly and objectively summarize all the comments
received, which has not been done in the draft sent just 24 hours before
our scheduled call.  I also find the staff's dismissive characterization
of many of  the comments opposing Formulation #1 entirely inappropriate.
If the report were to move forward in this form it would send the clear
message that participation in the public comment process is a waste of
time.  
 
Steve Metalitz
________________________________

From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of KathrynKL@xxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 12:59 PM
To: GNSO Secretariat; gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] Attached! Preliminary tf Report Purpose Whois
and Whois con...


I would like to propose we move the meeting until next Wednesday.  I
think the report deserves to be closely reviewed and the comments
discussed.  With so many comments, and so much new text, we all need
some time to do our work.

With thanks to Maria and Glen for the report,
Kathy