ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-dow123]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-dow123] Attached! Preliminary tf Report Purpose Whois and Whois con...

  • To: <jordyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123] Attached! Preliminary tf Report Purpose Whois and Whois con...
  • From: "Steve Metalitz" <metalitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 17:17:04 -0500

Per Jordyn's request, attached please find some revised text for Section
5 of the report.  This reflects edits from some of the BC and IPC
representatives.  

Steve Metalitz

  

-----Original Message-----
From: Jordyn Buchanan [mailto:jordyn.buchanan@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 4:30 PM
To: Steve Metalitz
Cc: KathrynKL@xxxxxxx; GNSO Secretariat; gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] Attached! Preliminary tf Report Purpose Whois
and Whois con...

Here's what I think we should do.

I understand that the report was distributed rather late and that there
are some concerns.  We are also overdue in getting this report to
Council.

We will postpone tomorrow's call until next Wednesday, March 15.  On
that call, we will vote and the report will then be submitted to the
Council.

If you have concerns about the text contained in the current draft of
the final report, please submit proposed edits no later than the end of
the day on Wednesday, March 8.  We can use the remaining time to discuss
and finalize the changes.

I believe this is a reasonable compromise and should help us move ahead
while addressing concerns about the current language in the report.

Jordyn

On 3/6/06, Steve Metalitz <metalitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I agree with Kathy's proposal and would associate myself with David 
> and Tony's postings as well.  At a minimum another week would provide 
> time for the staff to fairly and objectively summarize all the 
> comments received, which has not been done in the draft sent just 24 
> hours before our scheduled call.  I also find the staff's dismissive 
> characterization of many of  the comments opposing Formulation #1 
> entirely inappropriate.  If the report were to move forward in this 
> form it would send the clear message that participation in the public
comment process is a waste of time.
>
> Steve Metalitz
>  ________________________________
>
> From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx]

> On Behalf Of KathrynKL@xxxxxxx
> Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 12:59 PM
> To: GNSO Secretariat; gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] Attached! Preliminary tf Report Purpose 
> Whois and Whois con...
>
>
> I would like to propose we move the meeting until next Wednesday.  I 
> think the report deserves to be closely reviewed and the comments 
> discussed.  With so many comments, and so much new text, we all need 
> some time to do our work.
>
> With thanks to Maria and Glen for the report, Kathy
>

Attachment: ICANN Whois PURPOSE PRELIM report consol edits 030806.doc
Description: ICANN Whois PURPOSE PRELIM report consol edits 030806.doc



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy