ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-dow123]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-dow123] Re: Updates

  • To: "'ross@xxxxxxxxxx'" <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'metalitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <metalitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] Re: Updates
  • From: "Fares, David" <DFares@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 15:39:32 -0500

Ross,

While it wasn't a vote respondents noted what formulation they supported.  I
too believe that Jordan's original text is accurate.

Thanks,
David
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx
To: Steve Metalitz
CC: KathrynKL@xxxxxxx; jordyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sun Mar 26 15:23:58 2006
Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] Re: Updates

We have already heard from the chair of the GNSO that this is not a 
vote. Using the word "favored" implies a majority position. This is 
inappropriate wording for this slide.

A more compatible wording would be to state:

* Recently concluded public comment period.  Received approximately 45 
responses. Submissions summarized and included in final report to Council.

Steve Metalitz wrote:
> The slide is factually correct and I believe should remain as Jordyn has
> drafted it.  
>  
> Jordyn, aren't you going to miss this?????
>  
> Steve Metalitz 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of KathrynKL@xxxxxxx
> Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 11:56 AM
> To: jordyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] Re: Updates
> 
> 
> Thanks Jordyn for putting this together.  Hope everyone's travels to NZ
> were uneventful.
> 
> Jordayn, I see these slides as a continuation of Vancouver, and
> appreciate the updating you have done.  That said, I strongly object to
> the line on Slide 8 (Status of Work).  "*Recently concluded public
> comment period.  Received approximately 45 responses; most favored
> Formulation #2"
> 
> I think this leave a very incomplete impression.  If we wanted to say
> that "strong comments were submitted by both sides, with leading
> organizations weighing in for both formulations."  that would be fine.  
> 
> Or if we wanted to take the following lines line from our Final Report,
> that would be fine too:
>        "The comments show a division in the community, with 9
> respondents expressing support for Formulation 1 and 33 respondents
> supporting Formulation 2.  A number of the comments supporting
> Formulation 2 featured similar argumentation and structure which may be
> the result of one or more constituencies encouraging participation and
> responses during the public comment period."
> 
> It's a long sentence, but it is accurate and already agreed upon and
> published. 
> (and the issue is worthy of a little extra space and discussion).
> 
> Thanks, Kathy
> 
> <<
> 
> 
> 
>       Please find attached my first draft of the slides for the Public
> Forum.
>       
>       I'm glad to make further edits, or if people in Wellington want
> to
>       co-ordinate any changes, that's fine as well.
>       
>       We should probably designate someone to give the presentation in
>       Wellington.  Any volunteers?
>       
>       Jordyn
>       
>       On 3/23/06, Jordyn Buchanan <jordyn.buchanan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>       >Hello all:
>       >
>       >A few updates ahead of Wellington:
>       >
>       >1) I will be sending out a proposed set of slides momentarily.
>       >Depending on how much time we've been allocated, these may be a
> little
>       >long and need to be edited down.  I'm glad to take comments and
>       >continue to try to work on these on the next few days.
> However, we
>       >are going to need to designate someone from the Task Force to
> present
>       >the slides at the public forum, because...
>       >
>       >2) I will not be in Wellington.  I have recently decided to
> leave
>       >Register.com, and as a result will not be making the trip to
> New
>       >Zealand.  We will probably also need to discuss what this means
> in
>       >terms of the ongoing chairing of the task force.  I do want to
> make
>       >sure that we don't lose track of our work, though, so I'm more
> than
>       >willing to continue to help out as we figure out an ongoing
>       >strategy...
>       >
>       >Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.
>       >
>       >Jordyn
>       >
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 

                        -rr








                 "Don't be too timid and squeamish about your actions.
                                            All life is an experiment.
                             The more experiments you make the better."
                         - Ralph Waldo Emerson


Contact Info:
Ross Rader
Director, Research & Innovation
Tucows Inc.
c. 416.828.8783

Get Started? http://start.tucows.com
My Blogware: http://www.byte.org



-----------------------------------------
This message and its attachments may contain legally privileged or
confidential information.  It is intended solely for the named
addressee.  If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or
responsible for delivery of the message to the addressee), you may not
copy or deliver this message or its attachments to anyone. Rather, you
should permanently delete this message and its attachments and kindly
notify the sender by reply e-mail.  Any content of this message and its
attachments that does not relate to the official business of News
America Incorporated or its subsidiaries must be taken not to have been
sent or endorsed by any of them.  No representation is made that this
email or its attachments are without defect.


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy