ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-dow123]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-dow123] ICANN staff message to registrars about accuracy of registrant data

  • To: "'Bruce Tonkin'" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123] ICANN staff message to registrars about accuracy of registrant data
  • From: "Bret Fausett" <bfausett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 20:36:42 -0700

This is not helpful absent a copy of the spam in question and/or the
identity of the domain name. 
 
              -- Bret

  _____  

From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Bruce Tonkin
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 4:28 PM
To: gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-dow123] ICANN staff message to registrars about accuracy of
registrant data


 


  _____  

From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim Cole
Sent: Friday, 7 April 2006 3:17 AM
To: Registrars
Subject: [registrars] FW: sending letters to my government representatives
regarding ICANN failure to monitor


Dear Colleagues,
 
I have been asked to forward the email below by the NTIA in the U.S.
Department of Commerce.  It echoes a message that we hear often at ICANN
about Whois accuracy.
 
Regards,

Tim Cole
Chief Registrar Liaison
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers            


 


Fwd: sending letters to my government representatives regarding ICANN
failure to monitor


To whom it may concern,


I recently received SPAM to an email account from an entity which whom I
have no business or interest with.
In looking up that entities domain in the whois lookup, it was evident that
the registrar for that domain had
no rules for detecting even the simplest fraudulent registration. What I saw
was an invalid zipcode, city,
and telephone contact number for the domain listed in the email.


It is pathetic that there is NO facilities to address this, that this
'event' even happened, and that the registrar
of this domain is permitted to continue operation while not having
implemented basic validation of validity of
it's customers.


As I stated in the subject, I will be notifying my local, state and federal
government representatives of this
failure and ask that provisions be mandated for each registrar to validate
customer data and that ICANN provide
a policing policy and automated verification process for this.




Doug LaRue




Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy