Re: [gnso-dow123] Proposed Amendment to oPOC Proposal

["Marilyn Cade" <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks, that was my interpretation of Ross' new language. Marilyn
Regards,
Marilyn Cade


-----Original Message-----
From: Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:35:22 
To:Paul Stahura <stahura@xxxxxxxx>
Cc:KathrynKL@xxxxxxx, gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] Proposed Amendment to oPOC Proposal

Paul Stahura wrote:

> my understanding is that it would be mandatory for registrars to provide
> the ability to enter two POCs, and registrars can allow more than two to
> be entered.
> 
> However many are entered it would be mandatory for the registrar to
> display all that are entered.

Yes. This is a correct interpretation.

Registrar must provide for at least two POCs.
Registrants must provide at least one POC.
Registrars may provide more than two POCs.
Registrars must display all POCs supplied.

> 
>  
> 
> I support the new language

Thanks.

-r