<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-dow123] Whois
- To: Milton Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123] Whois
- From: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:33:38 -0700
I agree with Milton. It is only somewhat reassuring to hear it from Denise or
yourself. But unless it is in writing from Twomey it doesn't mean much. In
fact, I would take that a step further and ask that the Board as a whole, or at
least enough voting Board Members to pass policy, sign on to such a
statement.<BR><BR>Tim
<DIV id=wmMessageComp name="wmMessageComp"><BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 8px; MARGIN-LEFT: 8px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px
solid">-------- Original Message --------<BR>Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123]
Whois<BR>From: "Milton Mueller" <mueller@xxxxxxx><BR>Date: Mon, October
02, 2006 8:49 pm<BR>To: <gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR><BR>>>> "Bruce Tonkin"
<Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 10/02/06 7:04
PM<BR>>>><BR>>I can confirm that I raised the same issue with Paul
Twomey when I saw<BR>>the wording in the JPA, and he gave the same
assurances that Denise<BR>>Michel has provided. I can ask him to
confirm the statement from<BR>>Denise in writing<BR><BR>Absolutely, please
do get that confirmation. In writing. Thanks. <BR><BR>--MM </BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|