ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-dow123]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-dow123] For your review: DRAFT Preliminary Task Force Report on the Whois Service

  • To: "'Maria Farrell'" <maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123] For your review: DRAFT Preliminary Task Force Report on the Whois Service
  • From: "Marilyn Cade" <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 17:38:50 -0400

Thanks for getting this out by the week end. 

 

I have to take a look at this week end. However, I've already got a loaded
schedule of work due to the IGF and PDP Feb 06 and ITU Plenipot prep stuff.
I'm not sure that I'll make it all the way through the report. Will do my
best.

 

However, I have a question: 

The two proposals we are discussing still don't address how to access non
displayed data, if there is a change. That still has to be discussed and was
on the agenda for Monday's call. Don't we have to have that discussion? 

 

Finally, the work items tasked by Council from the Marrakech meeting to the
policy staff that were delivered some time ago, are relevant to the TF. Have
they been included in the materials discussed in the report. In my quick
glance, I didn't' t see whether they were there or not., 

 

Best regards,

 

Marilyn 

 

 

  _____  

  _____  

From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Maria Farrell
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 12:16 PM
To: gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-dow123] For your review: DRAFT Preliminary Task Force Report
on the Whois Service

Dear all,

 

Attached is the DRAFT preliminary Task Force Report on the Whois Service for
your review ahead of the next task force call (Monday next, 23rd October). 

 

Next Monday's call will discuss the draft report's structure and content,
and provide feedback on revisions to it. I would particularly welcome your
feedback on whether it will be helpful to include under each term of
reference a summary of the task force's discussion. This could be a useful
way to record broad areas of agreement and disagreement which are not
currently captured in the treatments of the proposals. 

 

All the best, Maria



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>