[gnso-dow123] Email from the Registry Constituency
- To: <gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Maria Farrell" <maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-dow123] Email from the Registry Constituency
- From: "Simon Sheard" <simon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 08:01:40 -0000
Jordyn, Maria, all,
Following continued discussions within the Registry Constituency I must
request an amendment be made to the Executive Summary report.
In our written statement (which is section 13.4 in my copy but part of
section 11? Presumably a bug?) we did express support for the Opoc proposal
but felt that it did not go nearly far enough when it came to addressing the
question of access to data by parties having legitimate needs for such
access. We also highlighted the necessity of Sponsored Registries to be able
to determine the eligibility of registration applicants themselves something
which is not adequately covered by the Opoc proposal either.
It is thus the majority view of the Registry Constituency that to include us
in the Executive Summary in a list of Constituencies who 'broadly' support
Opoc is misleading.
I thus must ask that the Registry Constituency be removed from the list of
those who are 'broadly' in support of Opoc, in the "Summary of the Task
Force Policy Recommendation to the GNSO Council" section in the Executive
For the avoidance of doubt can I also ask, if a paragraph is included along
the lines that Milton has proposed, that the three Constituencies in support
of the Special Circumstances Proposal are actually named.
Finally, we would like to request that a new paragraph be added, after
Milton's paragraph, as follows:
"While the Registry Constituency prefers the Opoc solution to the Special
Circumstances proposal it is unable to give it's support at this time since
it does not adequately address the question of access to data by parties,
such as law enforcement, who have legitimate needs for such access, nor does
it adequately deal with the issue that Sponsored Registries must be able to
determine certain eligibility requirements themselves."
Please accept my apologies for the delay in communicating this to the
Taskforce but I have had difficulties in contacting members of the Registry
Constituency in the last few days.
On Behalf of the Registry Constituency