RE: [gnso-dt-wg] IPC RFI Report

["Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Not sure that is a fair statement. From the very beginning, members of
the Ad Hoc group had discussed the PIR solution (and others like it)
which have actually reduced tasting in .org while still allowing for
legitimate deletes during the AGP.

 

Regardless of the outcome of the survey, I would ask that the IPC (and
others) have an open mind as to the realm of possible solutions.

 

Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq. 
Sr. Director, Law, Advanced Services  & 

Business Development 

NeuStar, Inc. 
e-mail: Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>  

________________________________

From: Rosette, Kristina [mailto:krosette@xxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 1:37 PM
To: Neuman, Jeff; gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-dt-wg] IPC RFI Report

 

It was not posed, but I certainly would have considered it if it had
been suggested in the 6-week period during which the ad hoc group could
comment on the potential questions.

 

 

 

        
________________________________


        From: Neuman, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 1:35 PM
        To: Rosette, Kristina; gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: RE: [gnso-dt-wg] IPC RFI Report

        Kristina,

         

        I note the last paragraph of your report states:

         

        Virtually all respondents made clear that they believe the
negative effects of domain tasting far outweigh the benefits, if any,
and thus believe the best possible solution is elimination of the AGP.  

         

        A question I have, and to be honestly I cant remember what the
IPC survey said, but was the following question ever posted to the IPC:

         

        "If it is possible to eliminate domain name tasting while at the
same time retaining the AGP for the purposes for which it was intended,
would they still believe the best possible solution is eliminating the
AGP?"

         

        The reason I ask is that I believe it is possible to do both.  I
believe it is possible to eliminate (or at least drastically reduce
tasting), while at the same time allowing a certain amount of deletes
for legitimate reasons.  I respectfully ask that the IPC be open to
those possible solutions.  Taking the hard line stance of eliminating
the AGP at all costs, in my view, may be counterproductive in the long
run.

         

         

        Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq. 
        Sr. Director, Law, Advanced Services  & 

        Business Development 

        NeuStar, Inc. 
        e-mail: Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>  

        
________________________________


        From: owner-gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina
        Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 1:09 PM
        To: gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: [gnso-dt-wg] IPC RFI Report

         

        All, 

        The attached document contains a summary of the results of the
IPC RFI.  (Olof, I'll send you a one or two sentence summary for the
beginning.)

        Please note that the IPC RFI questions in draft 1.4 are not the
questions as posed.  The correct set is the one I posted earlier today.

        Kristina