ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-dt-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-dt-wg] IPC RFI Report

  • To: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>, <gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-dt-wg] IPC RFI Report
  • From: <ricardo@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:46:59 -0300

IPC RFI ReportDear Kristina:

I agree with Jeffrey and I would like to remember that in Brazil,
registrants have the right to cancel any purchage and receive full refund
within 7 days, so, eliminate AGP is very bad news for brazilian registrars.

Best,

Ricardo Vaz Monteiro
Nomer.com
  -----Original Message-----
  From: owner-gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff
  Sent: quinta-feira, 27 de setembro de 2007 14:35
  To: Rosette, Kristina; gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx
  Subject: RE: [gnso-dt-wg] IPC RFI Report


  Kristina,



  I note the last paragraph of your report states:



  Virtually all respondents made clear that they believe the negative
effects of domain tasting far outweigh the benefits, if any, and thus
believe the best possible solution is elimination of the AGP.



  A question I have, and to be honestly I cant remember what the IPC survey
said, but was the following question ever posted to the IPC:



  "If it is possible to eliminate domain name tasting while at the same time
retaining the AGP for the purposes for which it was intended, would they
still believe the best possible solution is eliminating the AGP?"



  The reason I ask is that I believe it is possible to do both.  I believe
it is possible to eliminate (or at least drastically reduce tasting), while
at the same time allowing a certain amount of deletes for legitimate
reasons.  I respectfully ask that the IPC be open to those possible
solutions.  Taking the hard line stance of eliminating the AGP at all costs,
in my view, may be counterproductive in the long run.





  Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq.
  Sr. Director, Law, Advanced Services  &

  Business Development

  NeuStar, Inc.
  e-mail: Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

  From: owner-gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina
  Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 1:09 PM
  To: gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx
  Subject: [gnso-dt-wg] IPC RFI Report



  All,

  The attached document contains a summary of the results of the IPC RFI.
(Olof, I'll send you a one or two sentence summary for the beginning.)

  Please note that the IPC RFI questions in draft 1.4 are not the questions
as posed.  The correct set is the one I posted earlier today.

  Kristina




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy