AW: [gnso-et] Evaluation Team Wiki
- To: <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: AW: [gnso-et] Evaluation Team Wiki
- From: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:01:39 +0100
I'm not taking the lead of this team (following the diversity idea I would
prefer a female leader) but having just some time to think about I'd like to
share some procedural ideas with you and kick off conversation.
The ET is expecting some input and is expected - after internal processing - to
produce a certain output. The input shall be the application docs and the
output an "assessment" of these docs plus a report to the council.
1. Timing and applications processing
After the application deadline (07 March) all applications with GNSO
self-identification shall be sent to the council chair to be forwarded to the
respective SGs. In addition all apps without any self-identification according
to the AoC DT action plan shall be sent to the Council (DT or even ET?) for
identification purposes. If no allocation to any SG or At-Large/ALAC is
feasible these apps shall be handled by the ET.
After SGs notification of their nominations the (SG related) applications left
should be sent to the ET for the assessment. Constituency day (09 March) would
be an excellent date for the SGs to vote on their nominations. But to do this
successfully requires a timely distribution of the relevant applications to the
SGs/constituencies on 08 March.
Lets assume all this can be achieved as outlined then the ET could start on 10
March with the assessment. As members who attend the Nairobi meeting shall be
on travel from 12 March at the latest the assessment and report should be ready
by this date.
My suggestion: try to come up with a recommendation of candidates to the
The assessment should be based on the criteria lists (ICANN's and GNSO
requirements). Maybe we could do it by rating each application against each
criterion if applicable (not "ranking" of candidates). But this to my mind
makes sense only in case we have a critical number of apps. The assessment
result should be mirrored to the diversity requirements, too.
It seems to me that there is still some time to evaluate the assessment process
- it should be clear until 07 March the latest.
Von: owner-gnso-et@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-et@xxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von
Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. Februar 2010 22:43
An: William Drake
Cc: Glen de Saint Géry; gnso-et@xxxxxxxxx
Betreff: RE: [gnso-et] Evaluation Team Wiki
Is there another volunteer to lead the ET?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: William Drake [mailto:william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 3:58 PM
> To: Gomes, Chuck
> Cc: Glen de Saint Géry; gnso-et@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-et] Evaluation Team Wiki
> On Feb 23, 2010, at 1:09 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> > I sent a message last week asking if anyone was willing to
> take the lead on the ET but haven't seen any responses. I
> believe it would be very helpful if the ET would begin
> preparing for its work right away.
> > Bill - would you be willing and able to do that?
> This wouldn't be my preference, as my schedule prior to
> leaving for Nairobi is pretty tightly packed, and of course
> once I'm there it's the usual wall to wall sessions etc.
> Perhaps someone who's not attending would have a little more
> time? Anyway, the DT members here have been subjected to
> more than enough email from me of late :-)