[gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Meta: Strawman - Process vs. Policy

[Rodney Joffe <rodney.joffe@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I wonder if I could launch a strawman that triggered my question to  
the group:
Registries and registrars provide metrics (to be defined, but  
including elements like frequency of flux, date/times, ttls, etc).
Anyone can have access to this data, and can make their own decisions  
based on the metrics, including obviously using additional metrics  
provided by any other entity they trust (like apwg, phishtank, etc.).
Anyone can submit a request for takedown.

Registries and registrars are governed by a combination of contractual  
agreements (with ICANN and/or registries in the case of registrars) as  
well as local/national laws.
Based on these laws/agreements/policies registries/registrars act or  
do not act on requests that include evidence
Metrics relating to actions taken are published by registries/ 
registrars and third parties (like apwg, phishtank, etc)
Users can make decisions about which registries/registrars and or  
third parties to trust in whatever context they operate (anti-spam  
ops, web surfers, domain registrants).
Ultimately the market will influence behavior.

Notes:

Nation/State LEO obviously have the ability to enforce their laws.

ICANN has the ability to proscribe actions to be taken by  
registries(some) and registrars.
The market bears the cost.