Re: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Wiki Posting

["Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>]

eek!  i hope i didn't quash other ideas -- i didn't mean to hint at 
that at all.  ugh...
just a note to you all -- Randy posted his (terrific) case to the 
PRIVATE wiki, not our normal public one.  to pile on -- please don't 
let it out into the wild (by posting links to it on the public wiki, 
or to this email list).
m

At 04:22 PM 8/19/2008, RLVaughn wrote:

> I have posted a case study on the wiki.  All opinions
> expressed therein are mine.
>
> The case is very much a "live" case in that it exposes victim
> IPs and fastflux domain names.  I regard these data as sensitive
> but essential to the study.  I have made some redactions
> to some data which I consider to be too sensitive to release.  Those
> redactions and my rationale for not releasing them will be obvious
> to the reader.
>
> I seem to recall Mike hinting the case may do little if anything
> to help with issues of definitions, approaches, or solutions
> to the problems at hand.  It may, however, serve as some foundational
> material for those interested in the workings of an alleged fastflux
> network.
>
> I hope you find the writing to be not as horrible as you have every
> right to expect.
>
> Randy
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.138 / Virus 
> Database: 270.6.5/1620 - Release Date: 8/19/2008 6:04 AM