Re: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Information based solutions instead of policy based solutions

[Joe St Sauver <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

#      "*Should* ICANN take on this
#issue, or should ICANN and the registrar community do nothing
#in response to the fastflux problem, leaving any response to
#national regulators or local/national/international law
#       enforcement agencies?"
#
#I wonder if saying "ICANN and the registrars" limits the choices. What if 
#you said "or", and what if the ICANN community were to consider it 
#appropriate for registrars to exercise a bit more autonomy in regard to 
#dealing with abuse? Should a registrar (or registry) be able to certify 
#"approved responders" and take accelerated measures based on the trusted 
#reporting of such parties? This is pure speculation on my part, speaking 
#as an individual, not ICANN employee. I am simply suggesting that we put 
#all the alternatives on the table and if some are horrible ideas, we toss 
#them with the knowledge we've explored as many as we were able to imagine.

Fully supportive of your position as stated above, Dave... Excellent point.

Regards,

Joe