Re: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Understanding Fast Flux Fraud

[Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

It is certainly mine. A resilient CRM (url resolution set, resolved 
proxy set, and actual endpoints) does seem to cry out for a url 
publication mechanism. I suppose broadcast radio and television would 
work as well, but costless SMTP looks reasonably attractive, assuming 
that the SMTP has reasonable penetration rates through the endpoint and 
content filters known to exist to the authors of the activity.
Eric

Marc Perkel wrote:
> Tell me if this is accurate. Whenever there is fraud based fast flux 
> there is also a spam component that is spreading the word that links 
> to the fast flux domain. That's what gets people interested in the 
> fluxing domain. Fast Flux scams have a spam component.
> Is this an accurate assumption?