Re: [Bulk] [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Mike R's "24/7 abuse queue" proposal

[Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Greg Aaron wrote:
> Mike O. and Joe have stated that the incremental cost of running a 24/7
> threat-response capability is zero.  I think that's incorrect, and solicit
> comments.
>   
I'm costing out expanding CORE's hours of secretariat, from 
Europe+Africa, to that plus the Americas, and zero isn't the number I'm 
looking at, and I'm just costing for member support, which assumes 
reasonable people trying to be reasonable with each other, which may not 
be the best model for a "24/7 abuse queue" targeted by non-members.
I concur that the "incremental cost is zero" statement is incorrect.

Eric