<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Abuse in general
- To: "gnso-ff-pdp-May08@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-ff-pdp-May08@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Abuse in general
- From: Marc Perkel <marc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 06:52:01 -0700
Dave Piscitello wrote:
The criminals may have adopted short TTLs but that's not the only
marker. Anyone who looks at a DNS configuration, sees a short TTL, and
concludes "this is a fast flux attack" is going to be wrong. And we
have already agreed to this point.
Agreed. I sometimes use very short TTLs myself. Generally if I'm moving
from one data center to another. (Mass IP change) I will generally
reduce the TTLs to 5 minutes the day before. Then when I make the move
it changes quickly. After the move I set the TTLs back. If someone were
looking only at TTLs then I would be mischaracterized as a criminal.
Generally to get accuracy you need to look at a lot of information and
combine it. Fast TTLs is just one of many indicators. But it's a
combination of things that leads to a conclusion.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|