<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Proposed additional text, section 5, answering 5.2-5.7 at 365-379
- To: joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gnso-ff-pdp-May08@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Proposed additional text, section 5, answering 5.2-5.7 at 365-379
- From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 13:56:38 -0500
those omissions were on purpose. we had Dave's text in a previous
draft, and removed it. i concluded that we never really reviewed it
(remember, it was posted very early in the conversation) and decided
that it would not come very close to reflecting our (later) shared
understanding. your text never made it in, because it was quite
unfocused and generated a wonderful side-trip into a bunch of issues
around Port 25. i would propose that we leave both proposed texts
out of this draft, and let the next group develop more concise
versions once the basic research has been done to provide the underpinnings.
At 01:17 PM 9/2/2008, Joe St Sauver wrote:
--=======AVGMAIL-48BD85F50000=======
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Lines 365-379 list six of the questions that the working group
was charged with addressing, including 5.2:
"Who would benefit from cessation of the practice and who would
be harmed?"
Dave Piscitello's provided a fine answer to that question at
http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-ff-pdp-may08/msg00048.html , one which I
commented on at http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-ff-pdp-may08/msg00055.html
I propose that that text be included as a response to 5.2
When it comes to question 5.6, "How are Internet users affected by fast
flux hosting?" I addressed the question 5.6 in my note at
http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-ff-pdp-may08/msg00061.html
Again, I would propose that that text be included as a draft response to
5.6
Regards,
Joe
Disclaimer: all opinions strictly my own
--=======AVGMAIL-48BD85F50000=======
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="=======AVGMAIL-48BD85F50000======="
--=======AVGMAIL-48BD85F50000=======
Content-Type: text/plain; x-avg=cert; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Description: "AVG certification"
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.14/1647 - Release Date: 9/2/2008 6:=
02 AM
--=======AVGMAIL-48BD85F50000=======--
--=======AVGMAIL-48BD85F50000=======--
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|